We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 85

Financial litigation roundup - Autumn 2014
  • RPC
  • Hong Kong, Singapore, United Kingdom
  • December 3 2014

The High Court found that the defendants, Barclays and Tricorona, had misused the claimant, CF Partners’, confidential information and awarded


Financial litigation roundup - Spring 2015
  • RPC
  • European Union, Hong Kong, Singapore, United Kingdom
  • May 26 2015

The High Court clarifies the position regarding liability of investment managers, applying established legal principles of agency and inducement


Is credible deterrence really working? And other questions arising from a mixed week for the FCA
  • RPC
  • United Kingdom
  • May 28 2015

Even though the FCA was able to trumpet that it had imposed its highest ever fine and that it had been successful in two decisions handed down by the


Has the FOS decided Lehman's collapse was not foreseeable; or is that too remote a hope?
  • RPC
  • United Kingdom
  • July 15 2014

Nearly six years have elapsed since we first saw the iconic photographs of Lehman Brothers' employees filing out of the former bank's worldwide


Financial litigation roundup - Summer 2014
  • RPC
  • Hong Kong, United Kingdom
  • June 24 2014

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the German financial markets regulator, BaFin, are currently investigating manipulation of the “London gold


First reported interest rate swap mis-selling claim crumbles
  • RPC
  • United Kingdom
  • January 29 2013

Interest rate hedging products are sold in a variety of forms swaps, caps, collars and structured collars, to name but a few. Their objective is to


'The catalyst effect': does the buck stop with the Upper Tribunal?
  • RPC
  • United Kingdom
  • September 22 2015

I recently blogged on the Upper Tribunal's judgment on the case of Roberts and Wilkins v FCA. The Tribunal had agreed with the FCA's decision to


FOS leaving way open for consumers to seek top-up compensation on complaints, despite court closing “loophole”
  • RPC
  • United Kingdom
  • September 8 2014

Financial services companies put at disadvantage as claimants allowed second bite of the cherry; consumers warned court costs could eat up


Deal or no deal: FOS recommends taking legal advice following Clark v In Focus
  • RPC
  • United Kingdom
  • March 13 2014

Reacting to the decision in Clark v In Focus, FOS has updated its technical notes to help guide complainants who might have previously sought to top


Misselling of leveraged notes: not a marginal call
  • RPC
  • United Kingdom
  • April 16 2013

In Al Sulaiman v Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited the Commercial Court considered a claim for breach of duty in recommending investments