We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 3,424

State regulatory boards are open to antitrust liability, says the Supreme Court
  • Burr & Forman LLP
  • USA
  • February 27 2015

The Supreme Court's antitrust decision this week could have significant implications for various state regulatory agencies throughout the country


Swart v. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Prince Edward Island
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • February 24 2015

A successful appeal by a physician (Dr. Swart) with respect to the Respondent College’s decision that he was unfit to practice


2014-15 Supreme Court highlights
  • Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP
  • USA
  • January 22 2015

Approaching the midpoint of its 2014-15 term, the Supreme Court has added to its docket several cases with potentially wide-reaching implications for


Supreme Court reins in State action immunity
  • Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz PC
  • USA
  • February 26 2013

Last week a unanimous Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated opinion in FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc., addressing the "State action"


The State AG Report Weekly Update October 20, 2016
  • Cozen O'Connor
  • USA
  • October 20 2016

The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) reached a settlement with T-Mobile USA, Inc. and two of its brands, T-Mobile and MetroPCS (collectively


Second Circuit’s Caronia decision striking down on First Amendment grounds the criminal conviction of a pharmaceutical sales representative for off-label promotion could have broad implications
  • Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
  • USA
  • January 4 2013

On December 3, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated the conviction of Alfred Caronia ("Caronia"), who had been tried


Medicaid expansion is called unconstitutional by challengers' brief on the merits to Ohio Supreme Court
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • November 18 2013

The various interests that filed an Ohio Supreme Court lawsuit in October to block Medicaid expansion via the Ohio Controlling Board submitted


High Court sets out key principles to ensure a fair consultation process
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • April 10 2013

In the recent decision of R (on the application of Save our Surgery Ltd) v Joint Committee of Primary Care Trusts 2013 EWHC 439, the court quashed


Washington Healthcare Update - November 14, 2016
  • McGuireWoods LLP
  • USA
  • November 14 2016

Even though Republicans remain in control of the House and Senate there could be some changes in leadership on health-related committees: Senate


Don't Let Your Development Go to Pot! Tips for Leasing to Marijuana Retailers
  • WeirFoulds LLP
  • Canada
  • November 11 2016

While anti-drug activists continue to do a slow burn, Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau's Liberal government is (leisurely) marching forward on carrying