We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 12,149

‘Some other substantial reason’ dismissal
  • Hill Dickinson LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • April 20 2015

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has ruled that the fact a financial arrangement might be regarded as a misuse of public funds did amount to

Pistols drawn! Trademark showdown over mascot finally resolved
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • January 31 2015

Even though the year is 2015, two schools recently engaged in a dispute reminiscent of the Old West. This past October, Oklahoma State University

2014: the SCC year in review
  • Gowling WLG
  • Canada
  • December 16 2014

This article summarizes Gowlings picks for the most important decisions from the Supreme Court of Canada in 2014.Canada (Attorney General) v

Adverse economic effect of decision gives standing under AD(JR) Act
  • The Commercial Bar Association of Victoria
  • Australia
  • April 24 2015

In Argos Pty Ltd v Corbell 2014 HCA 50, the High Court held that an applicant whose profitability would be affected by a decision had standing

Privilege rules: solicitor-client privilege held sacrosanct by Alberta Court of Appeal
  • Blake Cassels & Graydon LLP
  • Canada
  • April 27 2015

In the Alberta Court of Appeal's ruling this month in University of Calgary v. JR, the court held that the Alberta Information and Privacy

Texas Supreme Court clarifies court's role in enforcing texas Citizens Participation Act
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • April 28 2015

On April 24, 2015, the Texas Supreme Court issued a per curiam opinion clarifying the evidentiary standards that will govern the application of the

Sentimental value
  • Hall & Wilcox
  • Australia
  • December 3 2014

Is there such a thing as 'sentimental value'? Well yes, there is, according to a judge of the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The NSW police

High Court decision shows difficulty of challenging changes to Government policy
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • December 4 2014

In the recent case of Solar Century Holdings Limited & Others ("Solar") v Secretary of State for Energy & Climate Change ("DECC") 2014 EWHC 3677

Do councils owe a duty of care to an applicant in assessing a development application?
  • HopgoodGanim
  • Australia
  • December 1 2014

A recent decision by the majority of the NSW Supreme Court of Appeal has rejected a claim of negligence brought by the applicant developer against

Web site a place of public accommodation for ADA purposes, court rules
  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • USA
  • May 7 2015

Despite lacking any brick and mortar location, a federal court judge in Vermont concluded that Scribd's Web site constituted a "place of public