We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 976

The "exclusivity principle" in a planning context
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • January 27 2011

The Court of Appeal has held that the service of a breach of planning condition notice is a "purely public" act, so the correct way of challenging such a notice is by way of judicial review proceedings


NPPF Paragraph 49: clarity at last
  • 39 Essex Chambers
  • United Kingdom
  • April 19 2016

On 17 March 2016 the Court of Appeal gave judgment in the linked appeals Suffolk District Council v Hopkins Homes Ltd & SSCLG and Richborough Estates


Judicial review challenges: When are you entitled to reasons?
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • April 28 2016

In the recent case of Karen Louise Oakley (Claimant) v South Cambridgeshire District Council (Defendant) & Len Satchell (Interested Party) 2016


Authority Update 22416 : Housing
  • Bevan Brittan LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • April 25 2016

H and others applied for judicial review of the council's decision to significantly amend its housing allocations policy by introducing a scheme


Restrictive covenants: can a local authority enforce a covenant preventing development for which it has granted planning permission?
  • Gowling WLG
  • United Kingdom
  • April 25 2008

A transfer of land in 2000 between Easington District Council and a private individual contained a covenant not to use the property other than as a coach depot and associated bungalow for residential use


“Just because.” The High Court rejects a common law duty to give reasons
  • Hogan Lovells
  • United Kingdom
  • March 31 2016

In Oakley v South Cambridgeshire CC 2016 EWHC 570 (Admin), the High Court held that South Cambridgeshire County Council did not have a common law


R (Weaver) v London & Quadrant (2009)
  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • November 5 2009

In a majority ruling, the Appeal Court judges backed a High Court decision a year ago that housing associations are public bodies and susceptible to claims under the Human Rights Act


Public law of no relevance in commercial land transaction dispute with local authority
  • Maples Teesdale
  • United Kingdom
  • January 13 2016

The recent Court of Appeal case of Dudley Muslim Association v Dudley Metropolitan Council 2015 EWCA Civ 112 is a reminder that if a local authority


Court declares guidance on affordable housing planning obligations and VBC unlawful
  • Bond Dickinson LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • August 4 2015

The High Court has ruled that the planning policy to exempt small developments from affordable housing contributions and the vacant building credit


General Counsel Update - June 2013 - A summary of major developments in key areas
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • Australia, European Union, Singapore, United Kingdom, USA
  • June 21 2013

The Companies Act 2006 (Strategic Report and Directors' Report) Regulations 2013 (Regulations) to amend the structure of UK annual reports have