We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,393

Hopkins Homes & Richborough Estates - all change but no change?
  • Shoosmiths LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • May 10 2017

The effect of the absence of a five-year housing supply is to trigger the presumption in favour of sustainable development, not just an assessment of


The "exclusivity principle" in a planning context
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • January 27 2011

The Court of Appeal has held that the service of a breach of planning condition notice is a "purely public" act, so the correct way of challenging such a notice is by way of judicial review proceedings


English Law Year in Review 2016 and Year to Come 2017
  • Linklaters LLP
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • January 5 2017

The High Court in November ruled that the government did not have the constitutional authority to trigger Article 50. The Supreme Court’s judgment on


Restrictive covenants: can a local authority enforce a covenant preventing development for which it has granted planning permission?
  • Gowling WLG
  • United Kingdom
  • April 25 2008

A transfer of land in 2000 between Easington District Council and a private individual contained a covenant not to use the property other than as a coach depot and associated bungalow for residential use


NPPF Paragraph 49: clarity at last
  • 39 Essex Chambers
  • United Kingdom
  • April 19 2016

On 17 March 2016 the Court of Appeal gave judgment in the linked appeals Suffolk District Council v Hopkins Homes Ltd & SSCLG and Richborough Estates


Planning permission granted during a local election ‘purdah period’ is upheld by the Court of Appeal
  • Bircham Dyson Bell
  • United Kingdom
  • August 15 2008

A recent, unusual planning case involving Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council has raised some interesting issues about decision making in local government around the time of local elections


R (Weaver) v London & Quadrant (2009)
  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • November 5 2009

In a majority ruling, the Appeal Court judges backed a High Court decision a year ago that housing associations are public bodies and susceptible to claims under the Human Rights Act


Blyth Valley Borough Council v Persimmon Homes (North East) Ltd & ors 2008 EWCA Civ 861 (29 July 2008)
  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • November 10 2008

Blyth Valley appealed against a ruling that quashed its bid to introduce a 30 per cent affordable housing policy


Harvey v Plymouth City Council 29.7.10
  • Kennedys Law LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • September 15 2010

Occupier not liable for serious injuries following fall over a tripping hazard at night; there was no implied consent to the Claimant's activities at the time


Portobello Park Action Group Association v The City of Edinburgh Council, 12 September 2012
  • Morton Fraser
  • United Kingdom
  • September 20 2012

In the Outer House Lady Dorrian had dismissed a petition for Judicial Review by the Portobello Park Action Group Association