We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 80

Keyword advertising - novel questions of honest concurrent use and passing off
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • United Kingdom
  • December 7 2016

Cases on trade mark infringement in the context of keyword advertising are rare. However, the UK High Court recently handed down a ruling on exactly


Damages for data protection breaches in the UK has the Court of Appeal opened the floodgates?
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • United Kingdom
  • April 3 2015

The Court of Appeal has issued a judgment that could make it much easier for individuals who are adversely affected by breaches of data protection


The thorny issue of keyword advertising: Interflora and M&S dispute set for retrial
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • United Kingdom
  • December 3 2014

Last year, we brought you news of Interflora's victory against Marks & Spencer ("M&S") in a keyword advertising dispute where M&S were found liable


Trade mark ruling Interflora comes up smelling of roses
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • United Kingdom
  • June 18 2013

The High Court has given its judgment in the now five-year old trade mark dispute between Interflora and Marks and Spencer (M&S). The dispute centred


UK: High Court judgment means online retailers must review how they use third-party brand names
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • United Kingdom
  • February 20 2014

Following last week's High Court ruling in the claim brought by Lush against Amazon, online retailers targeting the UK should review how they use


Online advertising - legal ruling on trade marks as keywords
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • October 16 2009

A report issued recently by the Internet Advertising Bureau shows that, for the first time, advertisers now spend more on online advertising than on television advertising


Illegal content on US server is within UK jurisdiction
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • United Kingdom
  • March 30 2010

In the case of R v Simon Guy Sheppard and Stephen Whittle, the Court of Appeal has confirmed that English law applies to material published online even if it is hosted on a server in another country


Amstrad revisited in the digital age
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • United Kingdom
  • April 27 2010

It is not only the person who carries out the infringing act who is liable for copyright infringement


Court widens scope of protection for ISPs under English law
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • United Kingdom
  • August 9 2012

In the recent case of Payam Tamiz v Google Inc the High Court appears to have broadened the defenses available to ISPs sued for hosting unlawful third party content


High Court finds online service provider liable for copyright infringement
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • United Kingdom
  • May 27 2010

In Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation & others v Newzbin Limited the High Court has found an online indexing service provider liable for copyright infringement