We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 2,472

Protection of graphical user interfaces in France
  • Santarelli
  • European Union, France
  • October 12 2016

Electronic products ranging from tablets to cars and even fridges contain a growing number of software components. Graphical user interfaces (GUIs


Lower court should have explained post-verdict damages award against Microsoft
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • March 8 2008

In Amado v. Microsoft Corp., the Federal Circuit ruled that a federal district court should have explained its basis for increasing a post-verdict award against Microsoft for software sold during the stay of a permanent injunction


Aktuelles kurz gemeldet - Oktober 2016
  • Taylor Wessing
  • European Union, Germany
  • October 5 2016

Ein Standardklingelton kann wegen seiner Banalität nicht als Unionsmarke (für u.a. Träger zur Verbreitung von Informationen auf elektronischem und


Databases and engines
  • CMS
  • European Union
  • January 7 2014

The CJEU has recently considered whether a meta search engine which searched a number of car sales websites to compile a consolidated list of results


Intellectual Property, Media and IT Newsletter (Portugal) 3rd Quarter 2016
  • Cuatrecasas Gonçalves Pereira
  • European Union, Portugal
  • October 31 2016

A recent decision of the Court of Justice dated September 8, 2016 considers the situations when posting a link


A common story: software developer loses rights
  • Wigley + Company
  • United Kingdom
  • June 25 2013

Here’s a story, where a developer lost rights to software it developed, that’s similar to others we see: a developer doing work for a customer on the


IP & technology review 8 December 2014
  • Roschier
  • Finland, Sweden
  • December 8 2014

The Market Court has on 19 November 2014 ruled on a trademark case (MAO:80914) concerning alleged slavish imitation and unfair exploitation of


Concept Winter 2014
  • Burges Salmon LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • December 5 2014

In Cartier v BskyB (2014 EWHC 3354 (Ch)) the Richemont Group (“Richemont”, comprising well-known luxury brands such as Cartier) applied for orders


Concept Autumn 2014
  • Burges Salmon LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • September 3 2014

The High Court has held that the Nintendo Wii consoleinfringes two of Philips’ patents; infringement occurring when the Wii is running the popular


Journal 2014 July to September for overseas readers
  • Watermark Patent & Trade Marks Attorneys
  • Australia, New Zealand, USA
  • October 22 2014

The controversial issue of gene patenting has hit the headlines, yet again, following the recent Full Federal Court of Australia (‘FFCA’) decision