We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 106

The potential impact of Brown v. Canada on ownership of intellectual property by employers
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • May 2 2016

Most employers, especially those who are active in research and development, as a matter of practice have employees sign agreements that specify the


Les répercussions possibles de l'arrêt Brown c. Canada sur les droits des employeurs à l'égard de la propriété intellectuelle
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • May 2 2016

La plupart des employeurs, surtout ceux qui sont actifs dans le domaine de la recherche et du développement, font couramment signer à leur personnel


Questionable Policy: New Canadian IP Enforcement Guidelines Miss the Mark on Pharma
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • April 5 2016

On March 31, 2016, the Canadian Competition Bureau released a long-awaited substantive update of its Intellectual Property Enforcement Guidelines


Canadian Internet law update - 2015
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • March 29 2016

This paper summarizes selected developments in Canadian Internet law during 2015. Internet law is a vast area that continues to develop rapidly


Intellectual property weekly abstracts bulletin - week of September 28, 2015
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • September 30 2015

No special circumstances found to allow the addition of a new ground of opposition 10 days before hearing McDowell v. Automatic Princess Holdings


Patent ownership was found to be assigned pursuant to an employment contract
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • May 27 2015

The Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta was asked to decide the ownership of patent rights as between an employer and an employee. The employment


Summary trial in trademark and copyright case results in dismissal of Plaintiff’s case
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • December 9 2014

The Plaintiff brought a motion requesting that the matter proceed by way of summary judgment or summary trial, which was agreed to by the Defendants


Intellectual property weekly abstracts bulletin week of August 18
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • August 20 2014

In this case, Apotex sought to enter the market with its generic version of travoprost. The Court dismissed the proceeding on the basis that Apotex’


Default judgement granted against defendant; punitive damages awarded
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • July 10 2014

The Plaintiff brought a motion for default judgement, as the Defendant had not defended the action. The Court considered the evidence filed on the


Canadian Internet law update 2013
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • March 27 2014

This paper summarizes selected developments in Canadian Internet law during 2013. This paper is an overview of significant developments rather than