We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 24

Novell prevails in jury trial on ownership of UNIX copyrights
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • March 30 2010

The jury in The SCO Group v. Novell, Inc. litigation over ownership of the copyrights in UNIX source code has ruled in favor of Novell, the company announced on its blog this afternoon


Limited damages available under DMCA 512(f) for wrongful takedown notice
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • April 14 2010

Although DMCA 512(f) allows an award of "any damages" for wrongful removal of alleged infringing material as a result of misrepresentations to a service provider, such damages "must be proximately caused by the misrepresentation to the service provider and the service provider's reliance on the misrepresentation," a district court ruled


Floor plans in online database not protectable under copyright law
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • April 14 2010

Copying of floor plans that were collected from third parties and compiled into an online database is not actionable under copyright law, a district court ruled


Operator of BitTorrent P2P file-sharing network induced copyright infringement and is ineligible for DMCA safe harbors
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • April 14 2010

The operator of a file-sharing network that utilized the BitTorrent file-sharing technology is secondarily liable for inducing copyright infringement by users of the network, a district court ruled


No bad faith in filing takedown notice where resolution of intellectual property rights underlying DMCA claim involved complex and novel legal issues
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • April 14 2010

A party who filed a takedown notice under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act seeking removal of a Web site in which he claimed copyright ownership did not act in bad faith where the resolution of the intellectual property rights underlying his claim involved complex and novel issues, a district court ruled


California single publication rule applies to web site right of publicity, Lanham Act claims
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • April 14 2010

The California single publication rule bars an individual's common law and California statutory right of publicity and Lanham Act false endorsement claims for the sale of merchandise on a Web site, a district court ruled


Domain name registrar not immune from trademark owner's infringement, ACPA claims
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • April 14 2010

A domain name registrar that registered numerous infringing domain names, provided private registration services in conjunction with a related entity that concealed the identity of the registrants, and received fees when ads on sites connected to the infringing domain names were clicked, may be liable under the Lanham Act and the Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, a district court ruled


Actual damages for copyright infringement of software code supported by monetary value of work by contributors to open source project
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • April 14 2010

A claim for actual damages for infringement of open source software code is not precluded because the code was distributed without charge, a district court ruled


Manufacturer of device containing DVD player has standing to assert violations of DMCA anti-circumvention provisions
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • April 14 2010

The manufacturer of a device containing a DVD player that implements DVD copy protection technology has standing to bring an action against a party who allegedly disabled the copy protection technology on such devices before selling them in online auctions, a district court ruled


Trademark owner's reports of infringing goods to online auction anti-infringement program protected by “interested party” privilege from defamation claim
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • April 14 2010

A trademark owner's reports of infringing goods to an online auction's anti-infringement program were privileged under California law, a district court ruled