We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,627

Real property, financial services & title insurance update: week ending September 4, 2015
  • Carlton Fields Jorden Burt PA
  • USA
  • September 9 2015

Party whose motion to intervene in foreclosure action was denied did not have standing to appeal final judgment of foreclosure


A hail dented roof is covered direct physical damage and loss
  • Merlin Law Group, PA
  • USA
  • June 15 2015

Only insurance company claims managers and their paid for lawyers could argue that a hail dented roof is not a covered loss under a property


Where not specifically listed as a pollutant, lead paint does not invoke pollution exclusion
  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • USA
  • May 20 2015

Do personal injuries resulting from lead-based paint fall under a pollution exclusion in a commercial general liability policy? According to a


“Tenuous” connection to professional services not enough to trigger exclusion, Ninth Circuit rules
  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • USA
  • May 20 2015

Finding a connection between allegedly wrongful conduct by a policyholder and the policyholder’s professional services to be too tenuous, the Ninth


Calculating actual cash value, part 9: Colorado
  • Merlin Law Group, PA
  • USA
  • May 24 2015

Colorado follows the Broad Evidence Rule for the purposes of calculation of actual cash value. The relevant case on this topic is Nebraska Drillers v


Washington Supreme Court defines collapse in a property policy
  • Gordon & Rees LLP
  • USA
  • June 25 2015

Until recently, Washington law on what constitutes "collapse" in a first-party property insurance policy has been unsettled. But that issue has now


Court defines "collapse"
  • Merlin Law Group, PA
  • USA
  • June 25 2015

The meaning of the term "collapse" in a first-party property insurance policy may often be litigated. My colleague,Nicole Vinson has written previous


Kentucky Appellate Court affirms multi-million-dollar bad faith and punitive damages award for policyholder’s emotional distress
  • Phelps Dunbar LLP
  • USA
  • March 27 2015

The Court of Appeals of Kentucky affirmed an award of almost $3.5 million against an insurer for causing emotional distress to its policyholder in


“Malicious” requires intent to harm
  • Gordon & Rees LLP
  • USA
  • April 15 2015

The California Court of Appeal recently held that an exclusion in an insured's homeowner's policy precluding coverage for "vandalism" did not apply


Washington Supreme Court misses opportunity to clarify the meaning of “collapse”
  • Cozen O'Connor
  • USA
  • June 23 2015

Washington State has long been a jurisdiction with no judicial pronouncement as to the meaning of the term "collapse" in a property insurance policy