We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 2,202

Minnesota Appellate Court Holds Title Insurance Company Not Liable for Boundary Line Dispute Under the Defective Description and Survey Exceptions
  • Riker Danzig Scherer Hyland & Perretti LLP
  • USA
  • May 11 2017

In a noteworthy decision for the title insurance industry, the Minnesota Court of Appeals recently held on April 10, 2017 that a title insurance


FENCE COVERED AS “DWELLING,” NOT “OTHER STRUCTURE”
  • Carrington Coleman
  • USA
  • January 27 2017

Nassar v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company Per Curiam (Opinion linked here) When is a fence a dwelling? When the insurance policy defines


Title insurance and foreclosure: What type of title coverage do lenders need in connection with a foreclosure in California?
  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • USA
  • June 7 2011

With mortgage defaults on the rise, a growing number of lenders are being forced to foreclose on their collateral, either judicially or non-judicially, exercising the private power of sale


USAA Texas Lloyds Company v. Gail Menchaca - Clarifying the relationship between an insured’s contract and statutory bad faith claims. Or does it?
  • Holman Fenwick Willan LLP
  • USA
  • April 7 2017

On April 7 2017, the Texas Supreme Court issued its opinion in USAA Texas Lloyds Co. v Menchaca in an attempt to fulfill its "duty to settle the


Court rules that semicolon in statute means that force-placed insurance provision of RESPA is not yet effective
  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • USA
  • October 3 2011

In Williams v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, ruled that a semicolon contained in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act means that force-placed insurance provisions contained in the amendments to the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”) are not yet in effect


Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) - A Handy Desk Reference
  • Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
  • USA
  • July 15 2016

The purpose of this desk book is to provide legal professionals with a working knowledge of the scope and limits of the benefits and protections


Diminished Value Claims Under Homeowners Coverage Certified in Georgia Class Action
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • March 14 2016

The court in Thompson v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30308 (D. Ga. 2016), recently issued a mixed ruling on class certification


Unoccupied residence for any period of time is not, as a matter of law, an "increase in hazard" under an insurance contract
  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • USA
  • April 2 2010

Wavie Luster lived alone in her home in Merrillville, Indiana


Captive Reinsurance Arrangements in the Mortgage Insurance Industry Upheld
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • USA
  • December 1 2016

While not the usual stuff that we report on, the DC Circuit’s rejection of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) determination concerning


eCommerce Regulation, Bitcoin, Anti-Money Laundering, Shadow Insurance, 401(k) Litigation Expect Focus - Vol. IV, Fall 2015
  • Carlton Fields
  • USA
  • December 23 2015

On January 1, 2016, Section 38.6 of the California Insurance Code will take effect permitting consumers to conduct certain life, disability, and