We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 52

Minox Equities Ltd. v. Sovereign General Insurance Co
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • September 30 2010

The insured owned a housing complex, for which it purchased a broad-form, all-risk policy of insurance from Sovereign-General Insuance Co. between 1993 and 2003


Choukair v. Allstate Insurance Co. of Canada
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • October 20 2015

An insurer was obligated to pay for the increased cost of repairs due to the additional work required under the Building Code. The relevant exclusion


Loss suffered by restaurant owners excluded under insurance policy’s Freezing Exclusion
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • March 14 2017

Damage to the insureds' restaurant was caused by two freezing incidents and was excluded from coverage by the freezing exclusion which provided that


Stewart v. TD General Insurance Co.
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • April 25 2013

An action for coverage under a homeowner's insurance policy to recover the full value of legally cultivated marijuana plants was dismissed. Coverage


Merei v. State Farm Fire Casualty Co.
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • July 25 2014

The insureds' homeowners policy had standard terms and was effective on February 25, 2006. The declarations page included the following statement


Robinson v. Primmum Insurance Co.
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • May 21 2014

Pollution exclusion in homeowner's policy may not apply to circumstances where sound insulation releases noxious gas that renders the home


Newbigging v. M. Butler Insurance Brokers Ltd
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • November 23 2012

No coverage for an insured whose property was vandalized while it was vacant due to a vacancy clause


Saskatchewan court finds brokerage did not make clear to policyholder an exclusion for vandalism based on vacancy
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • December 21 2011

The Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench recently found that a brokerage had breached its duty of care by not informing a client about a policy coverage exclusion for vandalism that applied immediately upon his rental property being vacated


Coleman v. Great American Insurance Co
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • February 23 2011

On September 1, 2006, Oldaker commenced action No. S065653 against the Insureds and others for, amongst other things, breach of duty to properly manage and administer a condominium common property and to promptly repair and maintain that property (the "Underlying Action"


Cheecham v. Saskatchewan Government Insurance
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • December 30 2010

The insured owned a single family rental property