We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 37

Monk v. Farmers' Mutual Insurance Co. (Lindsay)
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • February 16 2016

The exception for resulting damage was read in to the exclusion clause for "the cost of faulty workmanship" where the exclusion clause was silent on


Tedford v. TD Insurance Meloche Monnex
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • August 21 2012

Although the insurer was found to owe a duty to defend to its insureds, because most of the claims would not be covered the court ordered an apportionment of defence costs


Jamfamco Investments Ltd. v. Intact Insurance Co. of Canada
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • November 12 2010

The applicant, Aviva Canada Inc., brought an application seeking a declaration that the respondent, Intact Insurance Company of Canada, was required to defend and indemnify Jamfamco Investments Ltd. and its principal, John A. Macdonald, in a civil action brought against them and their subcontractor, Murphy, in relation to alleged deficiencies in a log home constructed by them in 1990


Jomaa v. Jomaa
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • January 16 2012

An application seeking a declaration that the defendant was an unnamed insured under the policy was dismissed when it was shown that the defendant, who was a relative of the insureds, maintained a separate and distinct household from the insureds


224981 Ontario Inc. v. Intact Insurance Co
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • May 19 2016

Insurer was obligated to pay a loss of rental income claim under a property insurance policy following a fire because the tenant was under no


Cabell v. Personal Insurance Co
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • April 19 2011

The appellants appealed the dismissal of their application for a declaration that their property insurance policy covered their outdoor in-ground swimming pool


Coleman v. Great American Insurance Co
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • February 23 2011

On September 1, 2006, Oldaker commenced action No. S065653 against the Insureds and others for, amongst other things, breach of duty to properly manage and administer a condominium common property and to promptly repair and maintain that property (the "Underlying Action"


Cheecham v. Saskatchewan Government Insurance
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • December 30 2010

The insured owned a single family rental property


Saskatchewan court finds brokerage did not make clear to policyholder an exclusion for vandalism based on vacancy
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • December 21 2011

The Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench recently found that a brokerage had breached its duty of care by not informing a client about a policy coverage exclusion for vandalism that applied immediately upon his rental property being vacated


Darch Estate v. Farmers' Mutual Insurance Co.
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • August 25 2011

Mr. Darch suffered from mental illness and set fire to his parents' home; the insurance issue was whether the intentional act exclusion in the insurance policy applied such that the defendant insurer was not required to compensate the plaintiffs for the losses