We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 43

Tedford v. TD Insurance Meloche Monnex
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • August 21 2012

Although the insurer was found to owe a duty to defend to its insureds, because most of the claims would not be covered the court ordered an apportionment of defence costs


Zheng v. John Galon Insurance Services Ltd
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • August 23 2016

Where an insurance application specifically asks whether an insured property will have renters or tenants, and the insured answers 'no,' an insured


Monk v. Farmers' Mutual Insurance Co. (Lindsay)
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • February 16 2016

The exception for resulting damage was read in to the exclusion clause for "the cost of faulty workmanship" where the exclusion clause was silent on


Hojjatian v. Intact Insurance Co
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • June 21 2016

Water damage caused by water seeping through the foundational walls of an insured's property was outside the scope of the insured's "water escape"


Newbigging v. M. Butler Insurance Brokers Ltd
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • November 23 2012

No coverage for an insured whose property was vandalized while it was vacant due to a vacancy clause


Saskatchewan court finds brokerage did not make clear to policyholder an exclusion for vandalism based on vacancy
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • December 21 2011

The Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench recently found that a brokerage had breached its duty of care by not informing a client about a policy coverage exclusion for vandalism that applied immediately upon his rental property being vacated


Cabell v. Personal Insurance Co
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • April 19 2011

The appellants appealed the dismissal of their application for a declaration that their property insurance policy covered their outdoor in-ground swimming pool


Coleman v. Great American Insurance Co
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • February 23 2011

On September 1, 2006, Oldaker commenced action No. S065653 against the Insureds and others for, amongst other things, breach of duty to properly manage and administer a condominium common property and to promptly repair and maintain that property (the "Underlying Action"


Cheecham v. Saskatchewan Government Insurance
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • December 30 2010

The insured owned a single family rental property


Darch Estate v. Farmers' Mutual Insurance Co.
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • August 25 2011

Mr. Darch suffered from mental illness and set fire to his parents' home; the insurance issue was whether the intentional act exclusion in the insurance policy applied such that the defendant insurer was not required to compensate the plaintiffs for the losses