We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 36

Monk v. Farmers' Mutual Insurance Co. (Lindsay)
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • February 16 2016

The exception for resulting damage was read in to the exclusion clause for "the cost of faulty workmanship" where the exclusion clause was silent on


Merei v. State Farm Fire Casualty Co.
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • July 25 2014

The insureds' homeowners policy had standard terms and was effective on February 25, 2006. The declarations page included the following statement


Snow v. Royal Sun Alliance Insurance Co. of Canada
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • April 19 2016

The appeal of a motion judge's decision determining that remediation of the contaminated land underneath the respondent's home was covered under the


Garden View Restaurant Ltd. v. Portage La Prairie Mutual Insurance Co
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • April 19 2016

An insured landowner's appeal seeking insurance coverage for remediation costs resulting from an oil spill on its property was dismissed. 2016 N.S


Robinson v. Primmum Insurance Co.
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • May 21 2014

Pollution exclusion in homeowner's policy may not apply to circumstances where sound insulation releases noxious gas that renders the home


Stewart v. TD General Insurance Co.
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • April 25 2013

An action for coverage under a homeowner's insurance policy to recover the full value of legally cultivated marijuana plants was dismissed. Coverage


Newbigging v. M. Butler Insurance Brokers Ltd
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • November 23 2012

No coverage for an insured whose property was vandalized while it was vacant due to a vacancy clause


Homeowner's insurance
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • September 27 2012

An application by a deceased individual's son for an order that the insurance policy covered the deceased's immediate family was dismissed where the court found that the Public Guardian and Trustee ("PGT") had taken control of the deceased's assets before her death and had all the deceased's rights, so she could not have passed such a right to the applicant through her estate


Tedford v. TD Insurance Meloche Monnex
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • August 21 2012

Although the insurer was found to owe a duty to defend to its insureds, because most of the claims would not be covered the court ordered an apportionment of defence costs


Jomaa v. Jomaa
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • January 16 2012

An application seeking a declaration that the defendant was an unnamed insured under the policy was dismissed when it was shown that the defendant, who was a relative of the insureds, maintained a separate and distinct household from the insureds