We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 28

Minox Equities Ltd. v. Sovereign General Insurance Co
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • September 30 2010

The insured owned a housing complex, for which it purchased a broad-form, all-risk policy of insurance from Sovereign-General Insuance Co. between 1993 and 2003


Mississippi River Power Corp. v. Municipal Electric Assn. Reciprocal Insurance Exchange
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • September 15 2014

Reasonable preventative measures taken by an insured to prevent probable future damages may not be recoverable where the policy excludes coverage for


Robinson v. Primmum Insurance Co.
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • May 21 2014

Pollution exclusion in homeowner's policy may not apply to circumstances where sound insulation releases noxious gas that renders the home


Merei v. State Farm Fire Casualty Co.
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • July 25 2014

The insureds' homeowners policy had standard terms and was effective on February 25, 2006. The declarations page included the following statement


Stewart v. TD General Insurance Co.
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • April 25 2013

An action for coverage under a homeowner's insurance policy to recover the full value of legally cultivated marijuana plants was dismissed. Coverage


Saskatchewan court finds brokerage did not make clear to policyholder an exclusion for vandalism based on vacancy
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • December 21 2011

The Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench recently found that a brokerage had breached its duty of care by not informing a client about a policy coverage exclusion for vandalism that applied immediately upon his rental property being vacated


Jomaa v. Jomaa
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • January 16 2012

An application seeking a declaration that the defendant was an unnamed insured under the policy was dismissed when it was shown that the defendant, who was a relative of the insureds, maintained a separate and distinct household from the insureds


Howalta Electrical Services Inc. v. CDI Career Development Institutes Ltd
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • January 16 2012

A fire destroyed a building occupied by tenants


Newbigging v. M. Butler Insurance Brokers Ltd
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • November 23 2012

No coverage for an insured whose property was vandalized while it was vacant due to a vacancy clause


Tedford v. TD Insurance Meloche Monnex
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • August 21 2012

Although the insurer was found to owe a duty to defend to its insureds, because most of the claims would not be covered the court ordered an apportionment of defence costs