We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 959

King v. Burwell will the Supreme Court tip the ACA dominos? Part 2
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • June 15 2015

In our previous blog post, we evaluated the legal issues at stake in King v. Burwell. We will now examine some of the ramifications of a Supreme


King v. Burwell will the Supreme Court tip the ACA dominos? Part 1
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • June 12 2015

The health care industry has been closely watching four cases challenging whether federal subsidies could be used to reduce costs to consumers for


Validus Court of Appeals decision - wholly-foreign retrocessions not subject to federal excise tax
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • May 29 2015

On May 26, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia upheld a District Court decision and ruled that the Internal Revenue


Validus wins round two: wholly-foreign retrocessions not subject to federal excise tax
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • May 28 2015

On May 26, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia upheld a lower court decision and ruled that the IRS could not impose


Life Partners, et al. v. Arnold et al.; Texas Supreme Court confirms fractionalized life settlement interests sold to Texas investors are investment contract
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • May 27 2015

The ruling - On May 8, 2015, the Texas Supreme Court, in Life Partners, Inc., et al. v. Michael Arnold, et al., case number 14-1022, unanimously


Massachusetts court rejects insurer’s attempt to recoup defense and indemnity payments
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • February 10 2015

In a recent decision, a Massachusetts trial court addressed whether an insurer could recoup previously-paid indemnity and defense costs from its


New York appeals court: Dishonest Acts exclusion does not preclude coverage for SEC-ordered payment
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • January 23 2015

Last week, the Appellate Division (First Department) of the New York State Supreme Court issued its latest ruling in the matter of JP Morgan


Massachusetts Appeals Court orders that 93A claim against carrier be severed, reverses trial court
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • December 5 2014

In Santacroce v. Sametz, a plaintiff brought suit against both the alleged tortfeasor for negligence, and the tortfeasor's insurer for bad faith in


Massachusetts high court rules that insurer’s full reimbursement of insured’s expenses does not bar insured’s G.L. c. 93A claim
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • November 26 2014

The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts recently considered whether an insured could pursue a claim against an insurer which had breached its


District of Massachusetts finds coverage under a professional liability policy in underlying case centered on unfair competition
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • November 12 2014

On October 28, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts denied an insurer's motion for summary judgment in a coverage