We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 44

Foster Farms sues insurers over definition of “recall”
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • July 11 2014

Poultry manufacturer Foster Farms has filed an amended complaint in its lawsuit against its Lloyd's of London insurers, which had rejected its $14.2


Insurance Co. seeks declaration to avoid possible “all natural” putative class action payout
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • December 12 2014

Months after a Florida federal court rejected a motion to dismiss a putative class action alleging that Bodacious Foods falsely labeled its cookies


Insurer sues to avoid coverage for Templeton whiskey’s alleged mislabeling
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • January 9 2015

Society Insurance has filed a lawsuit in Iowa federal court seeking a declaration that its policy does not require it to defend or indemnify Templeton


Settlement reached in coverage dispute for Four Loko maker
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • March 14 2014

The company that makes Four Loko, a caffeinated malt liquor beverage allegedly responsible for the deaths of five consumers, has reached a settlement


Federal court strikes insurance policy pollution exclusion
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • September 21 2012

A federal court in Wisconsin has reformed a 20-year-old insurance agreement, thus striking a so-called “absolute pollution exclusion” provision and potentially providing coverage for cleanup at a third-party site


Federal court rules pollution exclusion clause bars insurance coverage for slag placement
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • August 31 2012

A federal court in South Carolina has ruled that a pollution exclusion clause in an insurance policy bars coverage for property damage caused by the placement of slag that later leaked arsenic and lead into the ground


Insurer must defend claims based on insured’s use of non-pollutant floor sealer
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • February 15 2013

A federal court in Missouri has determined that a floor-sealing product used by a construction cleanup company was not a "pollutant" and that the


Insurer must defend Clean Air Act enforcement action
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • May 31 2013

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has determined that an insurer must pay defense costs in a Clean Air Act (CAA) violation action brought by the U.S


Seventh Circuit says no duty to defend four Loko maker
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • December 20 2013

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has determined that Phusion Projects' commercial liability insurance carriers have no duty to defend the company


Court requires insurer to defend CERCLA lawsuit
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • March 29 2013

A federal court in Pennsylvania has held that an insurer which insured an oil company from 1972 to 1982 was required to defend a case brought by the