We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 47

E-mails sent to transferred domain name and read by new domain owner not intercepted under ECPA
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • January 11 2011

E-mails that were sent to e-mail accounts connected to a domain name that was transferred pursuant to a settlement agreement, and that were read by the new domain name owner, were not "intercepted" within the meaning of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, a district court ruled


Use of e-mail client rule to acquire copies of e-mail messages violates Wiretap Act
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • January 11 2011

An employee who accessed the rule function on his supervisor's e-mail account in order to have copies of the supervisor's e-mail messages forwarded to him violated the provisions of the Wiretap Act that prohibit intentional interception of an electronic communication, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ruled


Forwarding of allegedly defamatory e-mail protected by Communications Decency Act section 230
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • January 11 2011

An individual who forwarded an allegedly defamatory e-mail received from another party is protected from liability under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which provides that a user of an interactive computer service cannot be treated as the publisher or speaker of information provided by another information content provider, a district court ruled


Law enforcement may obtain historical cell site data without warrant
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • January 11 2011

Law enforcement officials are not ordinarily required under the Stored Communications Act, 18 U.S.C. 2701 et seq., to obtain a warrant in order to obtain historical cell site data of an individual from a wireless telecommunications provider, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled


Prohibition against web site scraping unenforceable, where terms of use were not readily accessible
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • January 11 2011

A Web site operator could not enforce limitations on access set forth in its Terms of Use, where the ToU were not displayed on the site in a way in which a reasonable user could be expected to notice them, a district court ruled


No fair use defense for online post of 21-page book excerpt
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • January 11 2011

The blog posting of images of 21 pages of a soon-to-be-published book is not protected by the fair use doctrine and thus may be temporarily enjoined, a district court ruled


Ninth Circuit revises controversial opinion limiting government searches of electronically stored information
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • January 11 2011

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting en banc, revised its August 2009 opinion addressing warrant applications by law enforcement officials seeking access to electronically stored information


Tort plaintiff lacked reasonable expectation of privacy in social network communications
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • January 11 2011

A tort plaintiff lacked a reasonable expectation of privacy in e-mails and other communications shared with third parties on social networking sites, a New York State trial court ruled


Online provider's selective deletion and retention of third-party business reviews protected by CDA Section 230
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • January 11 2011

An online business review site is not liable for alleged defamatory comments posted by a third party user of the site, a New York trial court ruled


Transfer of packaged software was a license, not a sale, under copyright first sale doctrine
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • January 11 2011

A transaction involving the transfer of packaged software from a developer to a user was a license, not a sale, under the copyright first sale doctrine, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled