We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 3,762

The Supreme Court strikes down the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards
  • Latham & Watkins LLP
  • USA
  • July 1 2015

In a much anticipated decision delivered on the last day of the term, the Supreme Court struck down the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards, or MATS


Supreme Court halts implementation of EPA rule on mercury emissions from electric power plants: the practical effects are debatable
  • Burr & Forman LLP
  • USA
  • July 1 2015

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court halted further implementation of a U.S. EPA’s regulation limiting mercury and other hazardous air toxic emissions


Considerable costsSupreme Court requires EPA to consider cost impacts of power plant toxic emissions rules
  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

A closely divided Supreme Court has determined that EPA must consider cost when regulating emissions of hazardous air pollutants from stationary


Supreme Court rejects EPA's rule regulating hazardous air pollutants from power plants
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

On June 29, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was wrong not to consider the cost of compliance when it


Supreme Court rejects EPA rulemaking process for power plant emissions standards
  • Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

The US Supreme Court held yesterday that the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) unreasonably failed to consider costs when it made the initial


U.S. Supreme Court limits EPA authority to regulate power plant emissions
  • Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court held that EPA must consider compliance costs before regulating hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) from coal- and oil-fired


The Supreme Court’s EPA coal rules decision may still accelerate move to natural gas
  • Berger Singerman LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

The United States Supreme Court on June 29, 2015, saved electric utilities, and ultimately electric customers, billions of dollars a year when it


The Sidley shale gas and hydraulic fracturing report - June 29 2015
  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sent two proposed rules relating to oil and gas development to the White House Office of Management and Budget


Supreme Court finds EPA unreasonably failed to consider costs when regulating power plant emissions
  • Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

Today the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) improperly refused to consider costs when it decided to


U.S. Supreme Court invalidates EPA’s regulation of mercury from power plants
  • Jenner & Block
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

On June 29, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and invalidated U.S. EPA's 2012 regulation of