We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 267

Air standards necessary
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • December 9 2012

The Center for Biological Diversity, the Clean Air Council, and the National Parks Conservation Association filed an opening brief November 30 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit arguing that the Environmental Protection Agency must, under the Clean Air Act, set air quality standards despite scientific uncertainty


Energy & environment update March 04, 2014 - Environmental Protection Agency
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • March 4 2014

The Environmental Protection Agency filed a brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit February 24 charging that


Challenge to CO2 rule
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • August 12 2012

The Environmental Protection Agency filed an August 9 motion with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit requesting that the court dismiss challenges to the agency’s proposed carbon dioxide performance standards for new power plants


Light-duty vehicle emissions rule challenged
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • December 16 2012

The Utility Air Regulatory Group filed a petition for review December 13 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit challenging the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s October fuel economy and greenhouse gas emissions standards for light-duty trucks and model years 2017 to 2025


Uncertainties prevented NOx, SOx revisions
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • February 24 2013

The Environmental Protection Agency filed a brief February 19 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit saying that


Ks utilities entitled to nuclear storage costs
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • July 15 2012

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled July 12 that three Kansas utilities that together own the Wolf Creek Nuclear Generating Station near Burlington, Kansas, correctly apportioned their overhead costs for constructing spent fuel storage facilities and are therefore entitled to receive such costs from the federal government


Cross-State Air Pollution Rule challenge
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • April 1 2013

On March 29, the American Lung Association, the Clean Air Council, the Environmental Defense Fund, the Natural Resources Defense Council, and the


E15 challenge continues
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • February 24 2013

The American Petroleum Institute and the Grocery Manufacturers Association asked the Supreme Court February 21 to review a U.S. Court of Appeals for


Fake biofuel credit challenge
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • July 8 2012

OceanConnect LLC filed suit June 29 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia challenging 13 settlements the Environmental Protection Agency reached with petroleum refiners and others that purchased Link fake biofuel credits


Mercury challenge on hold
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • September 16 2012

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit granted the Environmental Protection Agency’s request September 12 to hold litigation challenging the agency’s air toxics standards for new power plants in abeyance while it completes an administrative reconsideration of the standards