We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 886

  • Blake Cassels & Graydon LLP
  • Canada
  • November 19 2015

De minimis non curat praetor : cet ancien adage juridique signifie que le juge ne doit pas s'occuper des causes insignifiantes. Sa portée a semblé

Applications for leave to appeal dismissed - 17 September 2015
  • Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
  • Canada
  • September 17 2015

Following a motorcycle accident, the respondent was treated by the applicant, an orthopedic surgeon, for a fracture to his right wrist. A full

No general right for grievors to remain unidentified in labour arbitration decisions
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • September 1 2015

The British Columbia Court of Appeal (in a recent case identified as United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1518 v. Sunrise Poultry Processors

Grievors may be publicly identified despite privacy legislation
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • Canada
  • August 19 2015

Employers will welcome the recent decision by the British Columbia Court of Appeal that the province's Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA

The perils of privacy breaches by hospital employees
  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • Canada
  • August 16 2015

Canadian privacy laws contain a basic safeguarding principle: access to personal information may only be granted on a need-to-know basis. Snooping

FOI adjudicator denies access to MOL inspector’s reasons for recommending no OHSA charges against employer
  • Dentons
  • Canada
  • July 17 2015

An adjudicator with the office of Ontario’s Information and Privacy Commissioner has denied access to a Ministry of Labour inspector’s reasons for

Duty of fairness extends to performance file for government employee
  • Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
  • Canada
  • June 8 2015

A recent decision of the Federal Court has affirmed the importance of a Federal government employee's right to procedural fairness. The dispute

Employer is not vicariously liable for a rogue employee’s privacy breach
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • May 19 2015

Two employees were working together in a Government Department. One employee, (“Employee X”), looked at employment insurance file of a co-worker who

The case for cause with a single act of employee misconduct
  • Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP
  • Canada
  • April 29 2015

In Steel v. Coast Capital Savings Credit Union (PDF), the British Columbia Court of Appeal recently confirmed that a single incident of employee

British Columbia privacy commissioner finds that a public body’ s use of employee monitoring software violated employee privacy rights
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • April 21 2015

On March 30, 2015, the British Columbia Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner issued an Investigation Report regarding its finding that