We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 28,028

Second Circuit Court of Appeals adopts “primary beneficiary test” and provides guidance on the unpaid intern question
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • July 27 2015

On July 2, 2015, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals issued significant pro-employer decisions in Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures (Nos. 13-4478-cv


A practical guide for employers following Obergefell v. Hodges
  • Roetzel & Andress
  • USA
  • July 27 2015

Although perhaps not unexpected, the United States Supreme Court's ruling on same-sex marriage (Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S.Ct. 2584 (June 26, 2015


Financial services update vol. 10, issue 25
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • July 27 2015

On July 20, the U. S. Department of the Treasury published a formal Notice and Request for Comment on the subject of expanding access to credit


Restrictive covenant update: don’t forget to establish your legitimate business interest!
  • Arnstein & Lehr LLP
  • USA
  • July 27 2015

Let's consider the following scenario. Executive is hired by an employer and signs a standard restrictive covenant agreement. Executive is later


Unpaid interns subject to primary beneficiary test under federal law
  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • USA
  • July 27 2015

In Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals (New York, Connecticut, and Vermont) defined and clarified the test under


Bewareif your appeal asks the Idaho Supreme Court to reweigh the evidence, you may be subject to an award of attorney fees on appeal
  • Stoel Rives LLP
  • USA
  • July 27 2015

In a recent post, we discussed Chavez v. Stokes, 2015 Opinion No. 64 (July 7, 2015), and the new standard of review governing the reasonableness of


Second Circuit revives contract attorney’s misclassification suit
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • July 27 2015

On July 23, 2015, the Second Circuit, in Lola v. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Tower Legal Staffing, Inc., revived a putative collective


EEOC brings sexual orientation claims under umbrella of Title VII
  • Lanier Ford Shaver & Payne
  • USA
  • July 27 2015

A recent decision about an appeal from the U.S. Department of Transportation, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) left no question it


Employee can’t count to 15 under ADA using volunteers or other companies’ employees
  • Barnes & Thornburg LLP
  • USA
  • July 27 2015

One of the most significant ongoing type of employment issues is the treatment as employees of individuals the employer thought were not &mdash


Who’s the boss? In policies covering multiple insureds, the details matter
  • Carlton Fields Jorden Burt
  • USA
  • July 27 2015

Liability policies for businesses are subject to a number of common exclusions; many, for example, do not cover liability to employees of the