We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 417

Supreme Court upholds federal health exchange subsidies under the Affordable Care Act
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • June 25 2015

On June 25, 2015, in King v. Burwell, the United States Supreme Court upheld the availability of subsidies to individuals in states that use federal


Treasury announces U-turn on SMR
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • October 15 2015

On 15 October 2015, HM Treasury announced significant changes to the Senior Managers' Regime (SMR), which is due to come into force in March 2016


Supreme Court holds that motivationnot knowledgeis key factor in religious accommodation case
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • June 2 2015

In a long awaited employment law decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled, 8-1, in favor of a job applicant who was denied a job at an Abercrombie &


Administrative, Court & Other Decisions - December 2016
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • January 3 2017

An NLRB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) ruled that Rite Aid unlawfully demanded a union to agree to remove certain future pharmacists and interns in


Follow-Up on Facebook Litigation Settlement
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • January 29 2016

I blogged Wednesday on the proposed settlement of the "shareholder" lawsuit against Facebook's over its directors' compensation, Espinoza v


Administrative, court & other decisions
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • June 3 2015

A split NLRB determined that an allegedly dishonest employee may be entitled to makewhole relief if his termination was based on the results of


Strikes & labor disputes - October 2014
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • October 31 2014

Airplane-cabin cleaners represented by SEUI Local 32BJ ended their strike after New York state officials said they would investigate complaints about


California appeals court requires reimbursement for employee personal cell phones used for work-related calls
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • September 2 2014

In the case of Cochran v. Schwan's Home Service, Inc. (Corchran), a California Court of Appeal held that California Labor Code Section 2802 requires


Administrative, court & other decisions - August 2014
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • August 31 2014

The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit ruled that the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board) correctly held that Harborlite


Employee did not violate the Stored Communications Act or Computer Fraud and Abuse Act by permanently deleting information from employer’s computer
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • October 16 2013

Recently, a Washington court dismissed an employer's claims under the Stored Communications Act (SCA) and Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA