We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 209

Do Amazon.com’s search results constitute trademark infringement?
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 27 2015

Holding that a reasonable jury could find that online retailer created a likelihood of consumer confusion through the format of its product search


What does it take to trademark your name?
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 27 2015

Addressing the question of when a professional name can be protected as a trademark, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit found that


Copyright law unavailable for removal of anti-Islam video
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

Overturning a hotly debated district court decision, in a case involving numerous amicus curiae briefs, the en banc Court of Appeals for the Ninth


Portion of California Resale Royalty Act struck down as unconstitutional
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

Addressing the constitutionality of California’s Resale Royalty Act, Cal. Civ. Code 986 (“the Act”), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth


Recent decisions narrow scope of liability under Video Privacy Protection Act
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • April 27 2015

Two significant decisions under the Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA) in recent weeks have provided new defenses to companies alleged to have run


Wireless does not mean “without wires”; “streaming video” does not mean emailing a video file
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • February 25 2015

Reviewing a final written decision of U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board), finding application claims unpatentable, the U.S. Court of


Post-Aliceclaims directed to an abstract idea must have meaningful limitations
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • December 30 2014

Addressing patent eligibility in a covered business method (CBM) patent review, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board


Post-Alice Federal Circuit finds internet advertising method to not be patent eligible
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • November 18 2014

Citing the Supreme Court of the United States’ Spring 2014 decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit


Transformative use in the Seventh Circuit
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 29 2014

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment based on fair use, but cited different


PTAB grants request for rehearing relating to procedure for serving petitions
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 1 2014

In an order granting a request for rehearing to address the issue of a filing date of a petition for Inter Partes Review (IPR), the U.S. Patent and