We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,516

Changing face of IP litigation
  • RNA, Intellectual Property Attorneys
  • India
  • August 26 2015

This note discusses two recent developments that has ramification for IP owners and practitioners and in turn deep impact on IP litigation in India


A.P. Shah committee recommends MAT relief for foreign portfolio investors
  • Duane Morris LLP
  • India
  • August 24 2015

Since we published our Duane Morris Alert on 19 June 2015 reviewing the Indian Government's applicability of minimum alternate tax (MAT) on foreign


Mahalakshmi case update: online Rummy operators get some respite
  • Nishith Desai Associates
  • India
  • August 20 2015

For the last few years the case of Mahalakshmi Cultural Association v. The Director, Inspector General of Police & Ors ("Mahalakshmi Case"), before


Bombay High Court rules on foreign-seated arbitration between two Indian parties
  • Khaitan & Co
  • India
  • August 20 2015

In the last decade the courts have issued a series of judgments which have strengthened the pro-arbitration stance of the judiciary with


Supreme Court’s decision on jurisdiction likely to have impact on IP litigation strategies
  • Khaitan & Co
  • India
  • August 19 2015

In Indian Performing Rights Society Limited v Dalia and Advance Magazine Publishers Inc v Just Lifestyle Pvt Ltd (CA Nos 10643-106442010 with CA No


Strict interpretation of law at the time of National Phase Entry in India, no amendments to specification, claims or drawings are permissible
  • RK Dewan & Co
  • India
  • August 19 2015

In a hard hitting judgement delivered on July 30th 2015, The Controller of Patents, at Calcutta (in Re: Ericsson) decided that entering the National


Offshore sale of equipment and supply of designsdrawings held not taxable in India
  • Vaish Associates Advocates
  • India
  • August 18 2015

Kolkata Bench of Tribunal in the case of Outotec GmbH v. DDIT : ITA No. 431 & 432 of 2014 & 283 of 2015 (Kol) dealt with the issue as to whether the


Aircraft overhaul expenses continue to be “fees for technical services” but not taxable absent source in India
  • Vaish Associates Advocates
  • India
  • August 18 2015

In DIT vs. Ms. Lufthansa Cargo India: TS- 299-HC-2015, the Delhi High Court held that payment made by assessee (an Indian company) to German company


Arranger fee neither “interest” nor “fee for technical services” so as to attract TDS
  • Vaish Associates Advocates
  • India
  • August 18 2015

In the case of Idea Cellular Limited vs. ADIT: ITA No. 1619Mum2011, order dated June 10, 2012 (Mum), the assessee had entered into a term loan


Levy of TDS on quarterly expense provision booked through suspense account
  • Vaish Associates Advocates
  • India
  • August 18 2015

The Bangalore Bench of Tribunal in the case of IBM India Private Ltd. vs ITO: ITA No. 749 to 752Bang2012 & 1588 to 1591Bang2012 (Bang) held that