We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 4,488

Court of Appeal construes aggregation provision in minimum terms and conditions of professional indemnity insurance
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • April 28 2016

The Court of Appeal has varied the decision of the High Court in AIG Europe Limited v OC320301 LLP and Others 2015 EWHC 2398 (Comm) and provided


Insurance claims settlement services not VAT exempt
  • RPC
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • April 27 2016

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has held in a recent case that claim settlement services provided on behalf of an insurance company by a Polish


Direct claims against insurers and anti-suit injunctions
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • Turkey, United Kingdom
  • April 27 2016

In Shipowners' Mutual Protection & Indemnity Association (Luxembourg) -v- Containerships Denizcilik Nakliyat ve Ticaret AS (The "Yusuf Cepnioglu"


InCredit - 26 April 2016
  • Addleshaw Goddard LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • April 26 2016

This week has seen HM Treasury consult on an innovation plan for financial services. The Financial Conduct Authority has published Handbook Notice 32


UK: “Read them the Riot Act”: Supreme Court holds that insurers cannot recover consequential losses from the police
  • Hogan Lovells
  • United Kingdom
  • April 26 2016

In the culmination of a test case on the extent of local police authorities’ statutory liability to compensate victims of riot (“Victims“), the


High Court rules on meaning of 'deliberate non-disclosure'
  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • April 26 2016

The High Court has interpreted the phrase 'deliberate non-disclosure' to require dishonesty on the part of the insured. Mutual Energy Ltd v Starr


Howe v Motor Insurers' Bureau: Whether claimant who sought indemnity from the Motor Insurers' Bureau was entitled to the benefit of QOCS
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • April 25 2016

Weekly Update 1216 reported the finding in this case that the defendant, the Motor Insurers' Bureau, was not liable to compensate the claimant, a


AXA Corporate v Weir Services: Whether England was the appropriate forum to hear an application for declaratory judgment brought by insurers
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • April 25 2016

Insurers issued, broadly, two types of policies to the insured: global liability policies issued in England covering companies in the insured's group


Mitsui Sumitomo v Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime: Supreme Court unanimously rules that consequential loss is not covered under the Riot (Damages) Act 1886
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • April 25 2016

The previous decisions in this case were reported in Weekly Updates 3213 and 1914. During the widespread UK riots in 2011, a gang of youths broke


Axon v Ministry of Defence: Whether losing claimant should pay the Third Party's costs
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • April 25 2016

The claimant lost against the defendant, and so the Third Party joined to the proceedings by the defendant did not have to indemnify the defendant