We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 31

BrandWrites - May 2017
  • Bird & Bird
  • Australia, Denmark, European Union, Hungary, Poland, Singapore, Spain, United Kingdom
  • June 8 2017

At Bird & Bird we're passionate about brands. BrandWrites by Bird & Bird is an international publication that explores topical legal and industry


'Good faith' under English law: Manchester United-branded products dispute breaks new ground
  • Bird & Bird
  • Singapore, United Kingdom
  • February 18 2013

Manchester United is a global brand which is very strong in Asia and the Middle East. In 2009 Singapore-based company Yam Seng entered into an


Singapore Court of Appeal considers revocation and invalidation provisions in the Trade Marks Act
  • Bird & Bird
  • Singapore
  • July 3 2009

The Court of Appeal ("CA") in the recent case of Wing Joo Loong Ginseng Hong (Singapore) Co Pte Ltd v Qinghai Xinyuan Foreign Trade Co Ltd and Anr 2009 SGCA 9 decided on various issues surrounding trade mark revocation and invalidation


Many heads better than two?
  • Bird & Bird
  • Singapore
  • April 28 2010

A recent decision by the Singapore Court of Appeal (CA) was issued in the case of Muhlbauer AG v Manufacturing Integration Technology Ltd. 2010 SGCA 6 on the danger of over-generalisation when deciding if a feature falls within the scope of a claim and the role of experts in the Court


Singapore High Court: No exemplary damages for patent infringement
  • Bird & Bird
  • Singapore
  • February 10 2017

The Singapore High Court has ruled, for the first time, that the court does not have the power to award exemplary damages for


Shehana Wijesena
  • Bird & Bird


Adele Lim
  • Bird & Bird

Ankur Gupta
  • Bird & Bird

Mark Holah
  • Bird & Bird