We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 25

Singapore High Court rejects marine fuel supplier’s substantial claim against ship-owner for payment of bunkers supplied to ship-owner’s vessels
  • Allen & Gledhill LLP
  • Singapore
  • August 31 2015

The Singapore High Court’s recent decision in The “Bunga Melati 5” examines the law of agency and the role and position of intermediate vendors and


Singapore Court of Appeal expounds on doctrine of anticipatory breach in relation to executed contracts
  • Allen & Gledhill LLP
  • Singapore
  • September 29 2015

The Singapore Court of Appeal in The “STX Mumbai” has clarified that, as a matter of legal principle, the doctrine of anticipatory breach does not


Singapore Court of Appeal considers whether obligation to use reasonable endeavours to obtain consent of third party extended to taking further steps after consent had been initially refused
  • Allen & Gledhill LLP
  • Singapore
  • May 28 2015

The case of The One Suites Pte Ltd v Pacific Motor Credit (Pte) Ltd was a decision concerning a sale and purchase contract between the parties, where


Singapore Court of Appeal holds backdated option void and unenforceable at common law
  • Allen & Gledhill LLP
  • Singapore
  • August 27 2014

In a recent decision, the Singapore Court of Appeal ruled that an option to purchase property could not be enforced as it had been entered into with


Singapore Court of Appeal considers requirements for derivative action under section 216A of Companies Act
  • Allen & Gledhill LLP
  • Singapore
  • February 27 2013

The Singapore Court of Appeal in Thiam Swee v Low Hian Chor clarified the law on the requirement of good faith for the purposes of applications for


Singapore Court of Appeal rules in favour of bank and reverses High Court’s finding of existence and breach of tortious duty of care owned to private banking customer
  • Allen & Gledhill LLP
  • Singapore
  • October 30 2013

In the recent decision in Deutsche Bank AG v Chang Tse Wen, the Singapore Court of Appeal overturned the High Court’s decision which allowed a


Singapore Court of Appeal finds CEO breached director's duties for making unauthorised payments to third parties albeit to procure business for company
  • Allen & Gledhill LLP
  • Singapore
  • May 27 2014

The Singapore Court of Appeal in Ho Kang Peng v Scintronix Corp Ltd (formerly known as TTL Holdings Ltd) upheld the decision of the High Court and


Singapore High Court dismisses application to bring derivative action under section 216A as notice requirement not complied with
  • Allen & Gledhill LLP
  • Singapore
  • February 27 2014

The Singapore High Court in Lee Sng Eder v Wee Kim Chwee E Ors considered the requirements to commence a derivative action in the name and on behalf


Singapore High Court dismisses company's claims of breach of fiduciary duties against director
  • Allen & Gledhill LLP
  • Singapore
  • July 31 2013

The Singapore High Court in Falmac Limited v Cheng Ji Lai Charlie considered a claim of breach of fiduciary duties pursuant to section 157(1) of the


Singapore Court of Appeal holds that an agent has the burden of explaining and justifying receipt and retention of payments received on behalf of principal
  • Allen & Gledhill LLP
  • Singapore
  • January 26 2011

The Singapore Court of Appeal in Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd & Ors v Dafni Igal & Ors considered two issues relating to alleged breaches of fiduciary duty by the respondents