We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 613

Unfair but reasonable scheme goes to shareholders: In the matter of Blackgold International Holdings Limited 2017 FCA 602
  • Gilbert + Tobin
  • Australia
  • June 27 2017

This case illustrates the preference of the Courts at a first scheme hearing to leave the question as to whether the scheme should be approved to be


Full Federal Court clarifies the fault position for civil proceedings post Gore v ASIC: ASIC, in the matter of Whitebox Trading Pty Ltd v Whitebox Trading Pty Ltd 2017 FCAFC 100
  • Gilbert + Tobin
  • Australia
  • June 27 2017

The Full Federal Court has held that it is not necessary for ASIC to prove fault according to Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code in civil proceedings


When will a single director have implied actual, or ostensible, authority to bind a company?: Colin R Price & Associates Pty Ltd v Four Oaks Pty Ltd 2017 FCAFC 75
  • Gilbert + Tobin
  • Australia
  • June 27 2017

This case provides some useful analysis and application of the law of implied actual, and ostensible, authority for a single director to bind a


The long arm of Australian competition law: High Court unanimously dismisses Air Cargo appeals, holding airlines competed in a market in Australia
  • Gilbert + Tobin
  • Australia
  • June 22 2017

The High Court has held that the geographical location of the market is to be determined as a practical matter of business, and is not solely dictated


“Put it on the JV tab” appeal dismissed
  • Gilbert + Tobin
  • Australia
  • June 15 2017

On 6 June 2017 the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Western Australia handed down its decision in the case of Santos (BOL) Pty Ltd v Apache


Validity of some granted mining tenements in Western Australia in question
  • Gilbert + Tobin
  • Australia
  • June 15 2017

The High Court will deliver judgment in a case in which the result might mean that procedural defects in an application may invalidate the tenement


ASIC announces that the Federal Court is to clarify whether it is necessary to prove Criminal Code fault in civil proceedings relating to certain breaches of the Corporations Act
  • Gilbert + Tobin
  • Australia
  • June 1 2017

ASIC has issued a media release announcing that the Federal Court has agreed to further consider whether it is necessary to prove fault according to


Unauthorised transactions in breach of a director’s statutory and general law duties: In the matter of FAL Healthy Beverages Pty Ltd and FAL Retail Pty Ltd 2017 NSWSC 476
  • Gilbert + Tobin
  • Australia
  • June 1 2017

The Supreme Court of New South Wales has provided some valuable insights into the nature, content and relevant parameters of the duties of directors


ASIC reports on its approach to regulatory technology
  • Gilbert + Tobin
  • Australia
  • June 1 2017

ASIC has issued a media release announcing that the Federal Court has agreed to further consider whether it is necessary to prove fault according to


Timing is everything when valuing shares of a start-up company: ILS Rehab Pty Ltd v Josephine Borg (as administrator of the estate of the late Damien Robert Borg) 2017 NSWSC 442
  • Gilbert + Tobin
  • Australia
  • June 1 2017

Timing is everything when valuing shares of a start-up company: ILS Rehab Pty Ltd v Josephine Borg (as administrator of the estate of the late Damien