We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,884

U.S. Supreme Court lets Natural Gas Act preemption seep away
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • May 7 2015

In Oneok, Inc. v. Learjet, Inc., No. 13-271 (April 21, 2015), the U.S. Supreme Court held in a 7-2 opinion that state law antitrust claims against


Round and round and round she goes, and where she lands, nobody knows: the future of Obamacare and why King v. Burwell matters a five-part series
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • March 9 2015

Last week, on Wednesday, March 4, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in the highly publicized case of King. V. Burwella lawsuit challenging


On the eve of oral arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court in King v. Burwell: Obamacare in the balance
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • March 2 2015

As every healthcare geek and Supreme Court wonk will tell you, on March 4, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral argument in King v. Burwell (an


Viability of certain Internet and software patents reconfirmed in DDR Holdings, LLC v. Hotels.com
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • December 9 2014

For those following the law of patent eligibility in the United States, a December 5, 2014 precedential decision by the Court of Appeals for the


Another blow to call recording class actions
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • December 2 2014

Back in February, the California Court of Appeal in Hataishi v. First American Home Buyers Protection Corp., 223 Cal. App. 4th 1454 (Feb. 21, 2014


Now that that’s settled: the status of class action settlements in the Seventh Circuit after Pella, Radioshack and NBTY
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • December 5 2014

Over the last several months, Judge Richard Posner has authored a triumvirate of opinions reversing the district courts' approval, over objections


Delaware Supreme Court confirms Chancery Court’s broad authority to impose use restrictions on information obtained from Section 220 books and records inspections
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • January 5 2015

In United Technologies Corp. v. Treppel, No. 127, 2014, 2014 Del. LEXIS (Del. Dec. 23, 2014), the Delaware Supreme Court held that the Delaware Court


Ninth Circuit holds that under Nevada law, a prior stockholder’s litigation of demand futility precludes another stockholder from litigating demand futility in a subsequent derivative action
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • January 5 2015

In Arduini v. Hart, 2014 WL 7156764 (9th Cir. Dec. 17, 2014), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit considered whether the


Bundled discounts subject to Section 1Clayton 3 scrutiny in the absence of market power and substantial foreclosure?
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • August 25 2014

Bundled discount programs have received significant antitrust scrutiny over the past decade, even though these marketing programs may benefit both


It’s not personal: Ninth Circuit denies putative class representative’s appeal as moot
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • January 6 2015

In Campion v. Old Republic Protection Company, Inc., No. 12-56784, (Dec. 31, 2014) the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that a putative class