We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,869

Plaintiffs hit an Illinois Brick wall: indirect purchasers of iPhone apps lack standing to bring antitrust suit
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • December 19 2013

On December 2, 2013, United States District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the Northern District of California dismissed a case against Apple


When 30 days just isn’t enough: the Ninth Circuit rules that defendants’ right to remove may not be limited to 30 days
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • February 25 2014

In Rea v. Michaels Stores, No. 14-55008, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 2928 (9th Cir. Feb. 18, 2014), the Ninth Circuit reversed the district court's order


The Ninth Circuit holds that bankruptcy courts have authority to recharacterize debt as equity
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • May 14 2013

On April 30, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the bankruptcy court has authority to recharacterize as equity


Transfer $8 million out of accounts in New York? That action alone is not sufficient to establish personal jurisdiction
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • April 30 2013

In Henkel v. Masiero, Index No. 6504252012 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., N.Y. Cnty. Mar. 18, 2013) (the "Opinion"), the Supreme Court (J. Bransten) granted the


The Eleventh Circuit reaffirms FCC’s authority to coordinate national TCPA policy and ensure uniformity of enforcement in Mais v. Gulf Coast Collection Bureau
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • October 16 2014

Courts that have confronted the application of the "prior express consent" requirement of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, see 47 U.S.C. §


No private attorney general fees for homeowner
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • December 26 2013

In Donald A. Norberg v. California Coastal Commission (4th Dist., Div. 3, 102513, G047522) ___Cal.App.4th___, 2013, the court of appeal reversed


Additional price of a judicial reaction: waiver of one's contractual right to arbitration
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • September 20 2013

In Volpe v. Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc., No. 6523082012, Judge Eileen Bransten denied plaintiff Ray Volpe's ("Volpe") motion to compel


United States Supreme Court holds that class action securities fraud plaintiffs need not prove the materiality of the alleged false statements or omissions to support certification of a class, resolving circuit split
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • March 7 2013

In Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans & Trust Funds, No. 11-1085, ___ WL ______ (U.S. Feb. 27, 2013), the United States Supreme Court


Second Circuit reverses dismissal of Section 11 and 12(a)(2) claims, holding that plaintiff's allegations were sufficient to plead a reasonable inference of misrepresentations in a prospectus
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • March 11 2013

In New Jersey Carpenters Health Fund v. Royal Bank of Scotland Group, PLC, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 4317 (2d Cir. Mar. 1, 2013), the United States Court


9th Circuit applies Dukes v. Wal-Mart to a wagehour class action
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • March 6 2013

On March 4, 2013 the Ninth Circuit issued a second opinion in the action, Wang v. Chinese Daily News (Wang II), in which it reversed the class