We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 2,113

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit sides with PTAB in inter partes review appeal
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • February 5 2015

In a decision imparting more certainty to the Post Grant Review process, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the "CAFC") held that it lacks


Oral argument in King v. Burwell concludes; debates ensue
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • March 4 2015

At approximately 10:00am EST this morning, the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in King v. Burwell - the highly publicized case


Supreme Court of New Jersey adopts FaragherEllerth affirmative defense
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • March 18 2015

On February 11, 2015, the Supreme Court of New Jersey expressly adopted the test created by the United States Supreme Court in Faragher v. City of


Ascertainability saps plaintiffs’ energy in dietary supplement class action
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • March 4 2015

In the recent decision Mirabella v. Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Case No. 12-62086-CIV-ZLOCH (S.D. Fl. Feb. 27, 2015) the plaintiffs attempted, but


Delaware Supreme Court reinforces importance of clear and precise bylaw provisions and specifically drafted notices of annual meetings
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • July 22 2015

In Hill International, Inc. v. Opportunity Partners L.P., No. 305, 2015, 2015 WL 4035069 (Del. July 2, 2015), the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the


New red flag for multinationals: retail price maintenance on Chinese AML regulator’s radar
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • China
  • May 10 2015

Section 14 of the Anti-Monopoly Law of the PRC (“AML”) clearly regulates retail price maintenance (“RPM”) and RPM definitely is on the radar of the


Second Circuit holds that SIPA does not permit an inflation or interest adjustment to “net equity” claims for customer property
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • February 27 2015

In In re Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, No. 14-97-bk(L), 2015 WL 727965 (2d Cir. Feb. 20, 2015), the United States Court of Appeals for


Those NDAs may not be worth the paper they are written on
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • March 24 2015

It is a given that companies strive to protect their intellectual property. Over the years, as an instrument of that protection, companies have made


Changing protected status of land requires CEQA compliance
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • July 7 2015

In Paulek v. Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority, the California Court of Appeals, Fourth District, held that removal of the


The California Supreme Court holds that certain security guards must be paid to sleep
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • February 9 2015

On December 31, 2014, the California Supreme Court held in Mendiola v. CPS Security Solutions, Inc. (Case No. S212704) that security guards who work