We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 2,144

Ninth Circuit blesses Iskanian
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • October 1 2015

On September 28, 2015, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a 2-1 decision in the long-awaited case of Sakkab v. Luxottica Retail North America


You May Want To Reconsider Your Position - EEOC Announces New Procedure to Handle Administrative Charges Against Employers
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • March 3 2016

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) recently announced new nationwide changes to the procedures relating to its investigation of


Delaware Supreme Court holds that a stockholder plaintiff must plead a non-exculpated claim to avoid Section 102(b)(7)-based dismissal when seeking damages from independent and disinterested directors
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • May 19 2015

In the consolidated appeal In re Cornerstone Therapeutics Inc., Stockholder Litigation and In re Zhongpin Stockholders Litigation, Nos. 564, 2014 and


California Supreme Court upholds San Jose’s inclusionary housing ordinance
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • June 26 2015

In California Building Industry Association v. City of San Jose (Case No. S212072, filed June 15, 2015), the California Supreme Court upheld an


California relaxes its “Made in the U.S.A.” law
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • September 9 2015

To the consternation of many, California law has long imposed a “Made in the U.S.A.” standard that has been more stringent than the federal standard


In Sprint victory, Judge Posner and the Seventh Circuit hold that arbitration is required in a TCPA class action even though the alleged violation occurred after the termination of the contract
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • May 18 2015

On May 11, 2015, in an opinion written by Judge Posner, the Seventh Circuit reversed an order denying Sprint's motion to compel arbitration in a


What is retaliation in the Second Circuit under the FLSA?
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • May 21 2015

On April 20, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed a long-standing precedent when it held in Greathouse v


Back to the future should stock incentive plans impose grant limits on non-employee director awards?
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • May 20 2015

On April 30, 2015, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware rendered an important case decision in a procedural matter dealing with the equity


Federal Circuit affirms, requires showing of benefit to the Government for allocability of development costs
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • December 8 2009

In Teknowledge Corp. v. U.S., Fed. Cir., No. 2009-5053, 110309, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the Court of Federal Claims (COFC) that software development costs were not allocable to the Government because the Government did not receive a benefit from the costs


The Supreme Court upholds the availability of subsidies on the federal exchangewhere do we go from here?
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • June 25 2015

One of the most highly anticipated decisions of the termat least among the Sheppard Mullin Healthcare teamwas issued today by the Supreme Court: