We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 2,062

Fourth District’s split decision further complicates CEQA requirements surrounding GHG impact analysis and mitigation measures dissent warns majority opinion will weaken and confuse the law
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • December 11 2014

In a split decision on November 24, 2014, the Fourth District California Court of Appeal invalidated the program EIR for San Diego Association of


Update: Sandoz and Celltrion decline the invitation to dance: biosimilars challenge the applicability of the BPCIA’s exchange provisions before bringing suit
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • December 16 2014

In our previous blog post of November 11, 2014, we noted that Celltrion had filed a declaratory judgment action against Kennedy Trust for


Employers beware! Employees are permitted to use employer’s email systems for non work purposes, including union organizing
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • December 12 2014

Overturning existing precedent, the NLRB has ruled that certain employees have a right to use employer email systems for protected communications


Viability of certain Internet and software patents reconfirmed in DDR Holdings, LLC v. Hotels.com
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • December 9 2014

For those following the law of patent eligibility in the United States, a December 5, 2014 precedential decision by the Court of Appeals for the


Now that that’s settled: the status of class action settlements in the Seventh Circuit after Pella, Radioshack and NBTY
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • December 5 2014

Over the last several months, Judge Richard Posner has authored a triumvirate of opinions reversing the district courts' approval, over objections


Another blow to call recording class actions
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • December 2 2014

Back in February, the California Court of Appeal in Hataishi v. First American Home Buyers Protection Corp., 223 Cal. App. 4th 1454 (Feb. 21, 2014


U.S. Supreme Court lets Natural Gas Act preemption seep away
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • May 7 2015

In Oneok, Inc. v. Learjet, Inc., No. 13-271 (April 21, 2015), the U.S. Supreme Court held in a 7-2 opinion that state law antitrust claims against


More risk for all and “free” care?
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • March 20 2015

While the Supreme Court continues to debate the outcome of King v. Burwell in their chambers, stakeholders must be prepared for the potential fallout


Uber, Lyft decisions highlight difficulty of classifying workers in the modern economy
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • March 20 2015

"The test the California courts have developed over the 20th Century for classifying workers isn't very helpful in addressing . . . 21st Century


Stripping the ACA of both the carrot and the stick: sticking it to consumers on and off the federal exchange
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • March 13 2015

Even as we write and you read, the Supreme Court in King v. Burwell is considering whether qualifying (often low income) individuals and families who