We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 2,355

Filling in some Actavis gaps - California Supreme Court adopts structured rule of reason test for antitrust scrutiny of pay-for-delay settlements
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • May 27 2015

A sweeping new opinion from the California Supreme Court revives California Cartwright Act challenges to pay-for-delay pharmaceutical patent


Life Partners, et al. v. Arnold et al.; Texas Supreme Court confirms fractionalized life settlement interests sold to Texas investors are investment contract
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • May 27 2015

The ruling - On May 8, 2015, the Texas Supreme Court, in Life Partners, Inc., et al. v. Michael Arnold, et al., case number 14-1022, unanimously


The Supreme Court opines in Tibble v. Edison that the duty to monitor investments is ongoing
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • May 21 2015

In a highly anticipated decision, the United States Supreme Court recently held that a 401(k) fiduciary breach lawsuit may proceed even when the


Supreme Court keeps Spider-Man maintaining the status quo - royalties end when the patent expires
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • June 24 2015

On June 22, 2015, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC, 576 U. S. ____ upholding a


Fifth Circuit holds the word “replace” in easement grant is ambiguous
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • April 14 2015

Neither the courts of Texas nor Louisiana have directly addressed the meaning of the word "replace" in the context of a pipeline easement and, in


Massachusetts Appeals Court holds primary insurer’s excess “other insurance” clause does not avoid duty to defend
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • July 22 2015

In Preferred Mutual Insurance Company v. Vermont Mutual Insurance Company, 87 Mass App Ct. 510 (June 17, 2015), the Massachusetts Appeals Court


King v. Burwell will the Supreme Court tip the ACA dominos? Part 2
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • June 15 2015

In our previous blog post, we evaluated the legal issues at stake in King v. Burwell. We will now examine some of the ramifications of a Supreme


King v. Burwell will the Supreme Court tip the ACA dominos? Part 1
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • June 12 2015

The health care industry has been closely watching four cases challenging whether federal subsidies could be used to reduce costs to consumers for


Federal Circuit affirms that no supplier exception exists when it comes to the on-sale bar
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • July 8 2015

On July 2, 2015, the Federal Circuit issued a decision in The Medicines Company v. Hospira, Inc., --- F.3d ---, 2015 WL 4033143 (Fed. Cir. July 2


Physician non-competition agreements again disclaimed in Massachusetts
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • February 25 2015

The recent Suffolk Superior Court holding in Velazquez M.D. vs. Eye Health Associates, LLC, highlights again the invalidity of non-competition and