We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,971

District Court upholds food effect limitation inherency after remand from the Federal Circuit
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • August 10 2015

In December of last year, the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland's ("the Court") decision


Medical marijuana apps illegal communication facilities or the next big thing?
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • April 22 2015

A number of recent news articles have discussed the increased activity in the area of technology companies that facilitate the delivery of medical


California Court of Appeal expands borrowers’ ability to recover attorneys’ fees under HBOR
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • June 18 2015

On June 12, 2015, the California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, issued its decision in Monterossa v. Superior Court (PNC Bank), Case No


A warning on the antitrust risks in private equity collaboration
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • March 25 2013

Private equity often collaborate with one another when bidding for an acquisition target by means such as the formation of consortiums or "clubs" to


Don't snag your deals on traps laid for trolls
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • European Union, USA
  • March 26 2013

The issue of non-practicing entities has been back in the news again recently. During a Google hangout last week, President Barack Obama used strong


Giving new meaning to an industry term
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • December 29 2014

In May 2014, PNP Petroleum I, LP, et al. v. Taylor et al. 438 S.W.3d 723 (Tex.Civ.App.San Antonio, May 21, 2014, pet. filed), PNP and Taylor


Employee benefits after Obergefell
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • July 29 2015

In a historic decision, the United States Supreme Court in Obergefell v. Hodges recently held that the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States


DOL continues misclassification push, says “most workers are employees,” not contractors
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • July 29 2015

When is a worker really in business for him or herself? This is the fundamental question addressed by the U.S. Department of Labor's (DOL


Federal Circuit affirms that no supplier exception exists when it comes to the on-sale bar
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • July 8 2015

On July 2, 2015, the Federal Circuit issued a decision in The Medicines Company v. Hospira, Inc., --- F.3d ---, 2015 WL 4033143 (Fed. Cir. July 2


Massachusetts Appeals Court holds primary insurer’s excess “other insurance” clause does not avoid duty to defend
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • July 22 2015

In Preferred Mutual Insurance Company v. Vermont Mutual Insurance Company, 87 Mass App Ct. 510 (June 17, 2015), the Massachusetts Appeals Court