We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 2,696

Advertising Law Snapshots Volume 1, Issue 15
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • September 22 2016

“Cheerios Protein” name is misleading because it says nothing about added sugar (and the product has more sugar than regular Cheerios


Common Law Rights & the UDRP: Standing and Bad Faith Registration
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • Global
  • September 21 2016

For many years now, Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP) Panelists have accepted common law rights as a basis for standing to bring a


Second Circuit Applies International Comity Principles To Overturn Antitrust Jury Verdict In Chinese Vitamins Case
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • September 21 2016

Yesterday, September 20th, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a $147 million antitrust class action judgment against two Chinese companies


Veritas Technologies LLC v. Veeam Software Corporation, No. 2015-1894 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 30, 2016)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • September 20 2016

PTAB may not summarily dismiss patent owner’s motions to further amend combination claims


Murata Machinery USA, Inc. v. Daifuka Co., Ltd., No. 2015-2094 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 1, 2016)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • September 20 2016

District courts have broad discretion to grant a stay of proceedings, but denial of a preliminary injunction motion must be supported by findings of fact and conclusions of law


Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Apple Inc., No. 2015-2073 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 10, 2016)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • September 20 2016

“Common sense” may provide a missing limitation in an obviousness analysis only when supported by evidence and a reasoned explanation


Court Rejects Arguments to Block Claims for Compensation Paid to Oil Spill Response Organizations
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • September 20 2016

In the continuing litigation saga flowing from the July 2008 collision between the MV TINTOMARA and the barge DM 932 on the Mississippi River near


Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., No. 2013-1472 and 2013-1656 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 5, 2016)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • September 20 2016

Decisions regarding enhanced damages applying the old Seagate standard require remand in light of the Supreme Court’s Halo decision


Wi-LAN, Inc. v. Apple Inc., No. 2015-1256 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 1, 2016)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • September 20 2016

A district court may consider claim construction arguments raised for the first time on a motion to reconsider


Antitrust and Competition - The EU Weekly Briefing (19 September 2016)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • September 19 2016

On 14 September 2016, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) handed down two judgments on appeals against the General Court’s judgments concerning the