We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 2,657

Update to 2014 Blog on Tax Effect of Compensation Clawback
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • July 27 2016

In March 2014, I blogged on an Illuminating Case on the Tax Effect of Forfeitures and Clawbacks. In Nacchio v. United States, the U.S. Court of


Antitrust and Competition - The EU Weekly Briefing ( 25 July 2016)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • July 25 2016

Request for ECJ to provide preliminary ruling on online selective distribution systems for luxury goods. On 18 July 2016, details were published in


In Re: Aqua Products, Inc
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • July 20 2016

Aqua Products, Inc. (patent owner) appealed from a written decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) in an inter partes review (IPR) of a


TLI Communications LLC v. AV Automotive, L.L.C
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • July 20 2016

TLI Communications appealed the Eastern District of Virginia’s decision that its patent failed to claim patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C


Genzyme Therapeutic Products v. Biomarin Pharmaceutical
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • July 20 2016

The patentee appealed two inter partes review (IPR) decisions of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), arguing that by relying on facts and legal


Bascom Global Internet Services, Inc. v. AT&T Mobility LLC
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • July 20 2016

The patentee appealed the district court’s grant of the accused infringer’s motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), finding that the claims


SAS Institute, Inc. v. ComplementSoft, LLC
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • July 20 2016

On SAS’s petition for inter partes review (IPR), the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) instituted a review on some but not all of the challenged


Officer’s Fiduciary Duty When Negotiating HisHer Own Compensation Agreements
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • July 20 2016

I have blogged frequently on the fiduciary duty of a board of directors or compensation committee when negotiating and setting executive compensation


Intendis GMBH, et al. v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • July 20 2016

In a Hatch-Waxman case, the district court held that the alleged infringer’s Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) product, a topical gel for the


Antitrust and Competition - The EU Weekly Briefing ( 19 July 2016)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • July 19 2016

Commission publishes full text decision on conditional approval of IAG’s acquisition of bmi. On 12 July 2016, the European Commission (Commission