We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 94

Dreadful sentence of the week
  • Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP
  • USA
  • February 18 2015

That’s from Whitlock v. Pepsi Americas, a hexavalent chromium case, and it was part of the reasoning that went into the court’s decision to grant


Ninth Circuit affirms order requiring divestiture of a hospitalphysician group merger
  • Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP
  • USA
  • February 10 2015

In a much anticipated opinion, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld an Idaho district court's order mandating the unwind of a


Chance is not a thing: so you can’t lose it
  • Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP
  • USA
  • December 12 2014

Conceptually the loss-of-a chance doctrine recently reaffirmed in Rash v. Providence Health & Services appears to make sense. The typical facts in


Warning for wellness programs EEOC sues over typical wellness program
  • Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP
  • USA
  • October 30 2014

Although the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the Department of Labor (DOL) have agreed on standards for wellness programs, and Congress seemed to


Yet another opinion in which a court mistakes hypothesis for theory
  • Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP
  • USA
  • October 13 2014

While some may imagine that scientific hypotheses are the product of highly educated people with brilliant minds drawing straightforward inferences


Federal appeals courts split on ACA subsidies
  • Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP
  • USA
  • July 23 2014

Two federal appeals courts ruled yesterday on a key provision of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) - and reached opposite conclusions. At issue is the


A tale of two decisions: circuit courts divided on ACA tax credits
  • Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP
  • USA
  • July 23 2014

Two federal appeals courts ruled yesterday on a key provision of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) - and reached opposite conclusions. At issue is the


Third Circuit decision erodes FCA pleading requirements
  • Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP
  • USA
  • June 25 2014

The Third Circuit's recent decision in U.S. ex rel. Foglia v. Renal Ventures Mgmt., LLC, 2014 U.S. App. Lexis 10549 (3d. Cir. June 6, 2014), evens


3 straw men on a witch hunt over Novartis drugs suit
  • Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP
  • USA
  • May 7 2014

He who is accused of sorcery should never be acquitted, unless the malice of the prosecutor be clearer than the sun; for it is so difficult to bring


Sixth Circuit decision highlights importance of antitrust considerations in health care consolidation planning
  • Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP
  • USA
  • April 22 2014

Capping one of the most significant periods of antitrust enforcement in the history of the health care industry, today the Sixth Circuit delivered