We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 326

European developments impacting dominant, vertically integrated operators the TeliaSonera judgment
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • European Union, Sweden
  • March 10 2011

On 17 February 2011, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) - on a reference for a preliminary ruling by the Stockholm District Court (SDC) - clarified, and indeed expanded upon, the scope of the law in relation to pricing practices of vertically integrated companies


National competition authorities in Europe are not bound by the European Commission de minimis notice
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • European Union
  • January 10 2013

On 13 December 2012, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) held that national competition authorities (NCAs) can apply European competition


ABA Antitrust Spring Meeting highlight: “Antitrust & Health Care: Square Peg in a Round Hole?”
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • April 30 2015

In this month’s American Bar Association (ABA) Section of Antitrust Law Spring Meeting, the program “Antitrust & Health Care: Square Peg in a Round


Supreme Court allows the passing-on defense in antitrust damages actions
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • Germany
  • July 8 2011

The German Supreme Court, in a landmark ruling handed down on 28 June 2011, has held that members of a cartel are able to defend themselves against a claim for damages by raising the defense that the relevant applicants have passed on the damage caused by higher prices onto a downstream market (the so-called "passing-on defense"


European Commission publishes decision fining Intel EUR 1.06 billion for abusing its dominant position
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • European Union
  • September 28 2009

In this important case, involving conditional rebates and unilateral restrictive practices, the Commission fined Intel EUR1.06 billion - the largest fine ever assessed on a single company


Supreme Court finds no pre-emption in Natural Gas Act case
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • May 1 2015

The U.S. Supreme Court recently held in ONEOK Inc. v. Learjet, Inc., that the Natural Gas Act (NGA) does not pre-empt state-law antitrust suits over


Seventh Circuit upholds dismissal of text messaging price-fixing claims
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • April 16 2015

On Thursday, April 9, 2015, the Seventh Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment for AT&T Mobility LLC, Verizon Wireless LLC


Private equity funds at higher risk of antitrust fines
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • European Union
  • July 17 2014

Recent trends in competition law enforcement in Europe show that private equity funds are increasingly exposed to potential liabilities for alleged


Foreign airlines move to dismiss rate-fixing litigation
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • January 16 2015

Last Friday, foreign cargo carriers filed motions to dismiss an air freight price-fixing suit brought by Schenker AG, the logistics division of


Court of Appeal of England and Wales allows challenge to jurisdiction in “follow on” damages claim
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • Italy, United Kingdom
  • December 16 2013

In Ryanair Ltd v Esso Italiana Srl 2013 EWCA Civ 1450 (19 November 2013), the Court of Appeal allowed a challenge to the jurisdiction of the