We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 2,847

Two generics can make a mark
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

The U. S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded for further proceedings the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board


No induced infringement where off-label use of a drug is not “inevitable”
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

Finding that a drug label’s language did not rise to the level of “active encouragement” that would induce doctors to infringe, the U.S. Court of


Employee benefits implications of Supreme Court decision on same-sex marriage
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

On June 26, 2015, in Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court of the United States determined that it is unconstitutional for a state to ban same-sex


CBM that recites scanning receipts, encrypting the data and transmitting not patent-eligible
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

Addressing the subject-matter eligibility of a business-method patent for scanning receipts, encrypting the data, and then transmitting it to a cloud


Submission of supplemental evidence in an IPR may be submitted after the due date
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

Addressing the circumstances for submitting supplemental evidence in an Inter Partes Review (IPR), the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board


A single entity must perform all steps of a method claim in order to commit direct infringement
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

Following a remand from the Supreme Court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed its prior panel decision, holding that direct


No “apportionment” requirement for design patent damages
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

Addressing the issue of damages for trade dress and design patents, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld the bulk of Apple’s


Copyright law unavailable for removal of anti-Islam video
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

Overturning a hotly debated district court decision, in a case involving numerous amicus curiae briefs, the en banc Court of Appeals for the Ninth


Only basic functions of a processor avoid need for disclosed algorithm
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

Addressing the question of what corresponding structure must be disclosed to support a means-plus-function claim element, the U.S. Court of Appeals


PTAB issues dissent for requested adverse judgment
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

In a case with more twists that a Game of Thrones plot, an unexpected dissent issued from an order of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or