We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 125

Federal Circuit Rejects ITC’s Authority over Intangible Articles
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • April 28 2016

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied a request for rehearing en banc in ClearCorrect Operating v. Int'l Trade Comm'n, (IP Update


Violation of ITC Consent Order Can Be Based on “Infringement” of Invalid Claims
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • December 23 2015

Reviewing the International Trade Commission’s (ITC or Commission) finding of a violation of a consent order, a divided panel of the U.S. Court of


Federal Circuit panel rejects ITC assertion of authority over intangible articles
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • November 30 2015

Reviewing an interpretation by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC or Commission) of its enabling statute ( 337 of the Tariff Act) for the


On remand, panel affirms ITC finding of Section 337 violation
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 30 2015

In a non-precedential remand decision, the original panel in the case of Suprema v. International Trade Commission affirmed the International Trade


Federal Circuit upholds ITC interpretation of 337 to cover induced infringement
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 27 2015

In a 6-4 ruling, a sharply divided en banc Federal Circuit overturned the original panel decision and deferred to the International Trade


Federal Circuit upholds ITC interpretation of 337 to cover induced infringement
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 17 2015

Suprema, IncBy way of background, appellee Suprema manufactures hardware for scanning fingerprints. The scanners must be connected to a computer


Activities for sNDA and citizen’s petition protected by “safe harbor”
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

In a case addressing the “safe harbor” provision of 35 U.S.C. 271(e)(1), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the district


Quantify versus quality determines domestic industry
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • May 28 2015

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a finding by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) of a violation of 337


ID on infringement and public interest in remand of interdigital investigation
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • May 28 2015

In a long-running investigation brought by InterDigital concerning Nokia mobile phones, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) on the remand hearing from


Divided commission upholds ALJ’s default sanction and attorney fee award against respondent and its law firm
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • May 28 2015

The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) upheld an administrative law judge’s (ALJ’s) ruling finding a respondent in default based on spoliation