We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 53

English High Court affirms basis upon which it will prevent a call being made under an on-demand bond
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • March 3 2014

In our March 2013 newsletter we explained, amongst other things, the characteristics of an "on-demand" (as opposed to a "conditional") bond provided


An end to “speculative” challenges to arbitral awards? The English courts raise the sanction of indemnity costs for unmeritorious s68 applications
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • April 3 2013

Over the past few years, we have seen a substantial rise in the number of applications to the English court challenging arbitral awards on grounds of


English Court confirms principles it will apply in deciding whether materials produced in an arbitration should be disclosed
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • February 1 2013

The recent case of Westwood Shipping Lines Inc and another v Universal Schiffartsgesellschaft MBH and another 2012 EWHC 3837 (Comm) has confirmed


The new LCIA rules
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • October 6 2014

The London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) has formally adopted new Arbitration Rules which came into effect on 1 October 2014, and will


How to terminate contracts effectively
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • December 19 2013

On 10th October 2013 the Technology & Construction Court, a division of the English High Court, decided the case of SABIC v PLL and SCL. The case


U&M Mining Zambia Ltd v Konkola Copper Mines Plc: Court of the seat does not have exclusive jurisdiction to grant interim measures in support of arbitration
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom, Zambia
  • February 28 2013

In the recent case of U&M Mining Zambia Ltd v Konkola Copper Mines plc 2013 EWHC 260 (Comm), the court examined the question of whether English


English Court of Appeal: The valuation of omitted works should not account for any breach of contract
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • August 29 2014

This is the second case between MT Hojgaard AS ("MTH") and E.ON concerning the construction of the Robin Rigg East offshore wind farm in the Solway


English High Court upholds two challenges to jurisdiction
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • March 22 2013

The English High Court has recently set aside two arbitration awards under section 67 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (1996 Act) on the grounds of lack


Fitness for purpose obligations take precedence over specification
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • June 30 2014

In the recent case in the English High Court of MT Hojgaard v E. ON1, it was held that a fitness for purpose obligation in a construction contract


High Court rejects challenge to an arbitral award for serious irregularity
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • October 24 2013

In the case of Primera Maritime (Hellas) Limited and Others vs Jiangsu Eastern Heavy Industry Co Ltd and others, published on 15 October 2013, the