We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 735

Massachusetts court rules for carrier in property dispute, orders return of advance
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • June 28 2011

The Massachusetts Appeals Court recently concluded that an insured could not claim property insurance benefits following a fire at its restaurant, because the insured had actual knowledge that its fire-suppression system was no longer functional, and because the insured had exclusive control over the system’s maintenance


South Carolina decision on allocation of defense costs creates a trap for the responsive insurer
  • Nelson Brown Hamilton & Krekstein LLC
  • USA
  • July 28 2014

A recent decision by the U.S. District Court in South Carolina confirms the state's position as an outlier when it comes to whether an insurer that


Florida Appellate Court holds that insurer must provide separate counsel to co-defendant insureds
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • March 4 2013

On February 20, 2013, the Florida Third District Court of Appeal held that an insurer was required to provide separate counsel to two


Fee exclusion deemed ambiguous
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • May 20 2013

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, applying California law, reversed an order granting judgment on the pleadings to an insurer


Post trial briefs: reviving a trade name damaged in litigation
  • Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz PC
  • USA
  • April 16 2008

Have you ordered a bowl of chili from Wendy's since the infamous finger in the chili incident in March 2005?


Tips for restaurant insurance claims in the aftermath of Superstorm Sandy
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • November 7 2012

Superstorm Sandy has caused immense damage to the East Coast, with losses estimated in the tens of billions


Supreme Court rules on health care reform: what does this mean for employers in the hospitality industry?
  • Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
  • USA
  • July 10 2012

Health Care Reform, in the form of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, has now survived review by the Supreme Court


11th Circuit holds E&O insurer has duty to defend legionalla claim
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • March 12 2014

In its recent decision in James River Ins. Co. v. Hufsey-Nicolaides-Garcia-Suarez Associates, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 4415 (11th Cir. Mar. 10, 2014


Connecticut Superior Court grants summary judgment for insurer based on total liquor liability exclusion
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • June 9 2009

An insurer was recently granted summary judgment against its insured based on a commercial general liability insurance policy’s total liquor liability exclusion ("TLLE"


Risk management? Red Sox will have to sweep the World Series this year for fans to get free furniture
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • April 11 2008

Last fall, we posted about a New England furniture company that, backed by prize indemnification insurance, offered customers the chance to get their furniture purchase for free if the Boston Red Sox won the World Series