We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 735

Cuba - U.S. Department of Commerce and U.S. Department of the Treasury implement regulatory changes
  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • Cuba, USA
  • January 16 2015

As previously reported, President Obama announced on December 17, 2014 that the United States and Cuba will seek to normalize their relations


Contest insurance, part two: protecting your payout
  • Thompson Coburn LLP
  • USA
  • February 27 2013

Part 1 of this series discussed how important it is to have contest insurance if the promotion has an expensive prize. It also warned that there are


Wash. Ct. Of Appeals: firearms exclusion precludes coverage for pre-shooting negligence
  • Stoel Rives LLP
  • USA
  • January 25 2013

In Capitol Specialty Insurance v. JBC Entertainment Holdings, Inc., et al. (pdf), the Washington Court of Appeals held that a firearms exclusion in a


Why more restaurants should purchase cyberinsurance
  • McCarter & English LLP
  • USA
  • May 21 2015

Restaurants face a cybersecurity threat that is pervasive and alarming. P.F. Chang's China Bistro, the Dairy Queen and Jimmy John's are just a few of


Princeton to pay $20 million to settle bad faith claim
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • July 2 2007

Princeton Insurance Company recently agreed to pay $20 million to settle a bad faith claim related to a dram shop lawsuit brought against their insured


Georgia Federal District Court finds that hot tub water is “intended for bodily consumption”
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • November 11 2009

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia recently held that an insurer had a duty to defend under a CGL policy and umbrella policy against claims relating to a hotel guest’s alleged contraction of Legionnaire’s Disease from a dirty hot tub


Massachusetts court rules for carrier in property dispute, orders return of advance
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • June 28 2011

The Massachusetts Appeals Court recently concluded that an insured could not claim property insurance benefits following a fire at its restaurant, because the insured had actual knowledge that its fire-suppression system was no longer functional, and because the insured had exclusive control over the system’s maintenance


South Carolina decision on allocation of defense costs creates a trap for the responsive insurer
  • Nelson Brown Hamilton & Krekstein LLC
  • USA
  • July 28 2014

A recent decision by the U.S. District Court in South Carolina confirms the state's position as an outlier when it comes to whether an insurer that


Florida Appellate Court holds that insurer must provide separate counsel to co-defendant insureds
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • March 4 2013

On February 20, 2013, the Florida Third District Court of Appeal held that an insurer was required to provide separate counsel to two


Fee exclusion deemed ambiguous
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • May 20 2013

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, applying California law, reversed an order granting judgment on the pleadings to an insurer