We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-9 of 9

Patent settlement agreements and the Competition Act “something more” required for conspiracy
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • Canada
  • February 11 2010

The Federal Court of Appeal recently confirmed that patent settlement agreements may be subject to the provisions of the Competition Act; however, "something more" than a mere assertion of patent rights is required to amount to conspiracy under the Act


Jonathan Bitran
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP

Anita Nador
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP

Donald B Houston
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP

Emily Rix
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP

Dominic Thérien
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP

David Tait
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP


Ian K. Bies
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP