We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,203

“Personal injury” and “employment practices” provisions reconcile; insurer must defend
  • Hunton & Williams LLP
  • USA
  • December 18 2014

On December 5, 2014, Florida's First District Court of Appeals held in Khatib et al. v. Old Dominion Insurance Co., case number 1D13-4652, that an


Insurance Co. seeks declaration to avoid possible “all natural” putative class action payout
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • December 12 2014

Months after a Florida federal court rejected a motion to dismiss a putative class action alleging that Bodacious Foods falsely labeled its cookies


California federal judge rules that carrier owes a duty to defend false advertising lawsuits
  • Hunton & Williams LLP
  • USA
  • May 28 2014

On May 13, 2014, in Millennium Laboratories, Inc. v. Darwin Select Insurance Company, Case No. 12- CV-2742 H (KSC), a California federal district


New mandatory exclusions in standard CGL policies limit coverage for data breaches
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • July 30 2014

The insurance industry continues to respond to the growing threat of data breaches by directing businesses facing that risk towards new


Prior publication exclusion negates duty to defend where similar advertising was published before and during policy period
  • Gordon & Rees LLP
  • USA
  • June 25 2014

The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, applying California law, affirmed a grant of summary judgment in favor of Great American E&S Insurance Co


Infringement of “slogan” triggers the duty to defend
  • Barnes & Thornburg LLP
  • USA
  • June 11 2015

In recent years, insurers have modified the coverage for "personal and advertising injury" in the standard form used in commercial general liability


California Supreme Court defines scope of advertising injury coverage
  • Latham & Watkins LLP
  • USA
  • August 21 2014

Hartford v. Swift imposes "specificity" requirements that may provide comfort to companies facing disparagement claims while requiring careful


Competitor’s false ad suit covered by liability policy
  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • USA
  • May 30 2013

A false advertising suit filed by a competitor triggered coverage under a liability policy, according to a federal court in Illinois. This case


Expect focus - volume III, Summer 2014
  • Carlton Fields Jorden Burt
  • USA
  • September 16 2014

EXPECTFOCUS is a quarterly review of developments in the insurance and financial services industry, provided on a complimentary basis to clients and


Not by "any manner" of means: securing cyber-crime coverage after Zurich v. Sony
  • Gilbert LLP
  • USA
  • September 15 2014

Much has been written about the New York Supreme Court's landmark ruling in Zurich American Insurance Co. v. Sony Corp., Index. No. 6519822011 (N.Y