We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,176

Insurance for advertising injury covers claims of defamation under New York law
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • August 6 2007

A federal judge recently ruled that because an underlying complaint filed against an insured included allegations of negligent and reckless defamation under New York law, an insurer had a duty to defend its insured


“Negligent publication” does not include false advertising or negligent misrepresentation
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • August 28 2008

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, applying California law, has held that a professional liability policy including coverage for “negligent publication” did not include coverage for class action lawsuits alleging negligent misrepresentation, false advertising, and related counts


“Negligent publication” does not include false advertising or negligent misrepresentation
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • September 10 2008

The United State Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, applying California law, has held that a professional liability policy including coverage for "negligent publication" did not include coverage for class action lawsuits alleging negligent misrepresentation, false advertising and related counts


The New York Mets’ insurance concern
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • September 16 2008

As the New York Mets’ players are focused on reaching the post-season, team management has other concerns insurance


SDNY judge transfers coverage dispute to California based on location of witnesses and events in the underlying action
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • October 27 2008

A New York federal court recently held that a coverage action between former television producers and their insurers should be transferred from New York to California because the events involved in the underlying action occurred and a majority of the witnesses and evidence is located in California


Denial of insurance for consumer fraudLanham Act claims: blaming the product, not the advertising?
  • Stoel Rives LLP
  • USA
  • June 9 2010

I'm often asked in my practice about the availability of insurance coverage for claims by consumers or competitors that products are deceptively labeled, marketed or advertised


Forgery of Renoir not covered by insurance
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • July 15 2010

Here is a hard lesson for owners of valuable art concerning their insurance policy: if it turns out that Old Master is a forgery, your insurance policy may not cover the "loss" you allegedly sustained by reason of the forgery


Insurer and television producer battle over coverage for infringing show
  • Arent Fox LLP
  • USA
  • July 13 2010

FremantleMedia, the producer of the reality show American Inventor, has asked the Central District of California to dismiss a counterclaim accusing it of fraud and negligent misrepresentation during mediation


Playstation hack - do Sony’s CGL policies apply?
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • July 29 2011

Sony insurers are engaged in litigation in New York state court to determine Sony entities’ claims for insurance coverage with respect to lawsuits, claims and potential attorney general actions arising out of the cyber-attacks earlier this year on the PlayStation Network (“PSN”), Sony Online Entertainment Network (“SOE”) and Sony Pictures Network, which allegedly resulted in unauthorized access to and alleged theft of personal identification and financial information of millions of customers


Vernick - bad news for D&O insurers?
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • August 1 2011

Scandal-plagued News Corp. Faces Lawsuits