We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,997

Ambiguity is as ambiguity does: another cautionary tale from a Canadian Appellate Court on the importance of clear drafting
  • Gowling WLG
  • Canada
  • February 12 2015

As a result of an alleged brain injury sustained during a sparring match with a martial arts instructor, the plaintiff in the underlying action


Aspen Interiors Inc. v. Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Co.
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • March 17 2015

Summary judgment application to determine the meaning of the word "load" in the following exclusion clause: "The weight of the load exceeding the


Forsythe v. Westfall
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • March 17 2015

An insurance claim associated with a tort claim with which a province has no jurisdiction simpliciter does not establish a real and substantial


What does your client's course of construction policy really cover?
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • July 23 2015

BC court interprets standard exclusion clause for first time after DesignBuild Contractor denied coverage; awarded $8.5 million in insurable losses


The Carter decision what’s next?
  • WeirFoulds LLP
  • Canada
  • February 13 2015

Our Estate Alert of February 6, 2015 discussed the Supreme Court of Canada "SCC"'s decision of Carter v. Canada (Attorney General)1 that was


Les polices d’assurance tous risques ne couvrent pas tous les risques
  • Blake Cassels & Graydon LLP
  • Canada
  • July 6 2015

Dans sa récente décision Ledcor Construction Limited v Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Company( Ledcor ), la Cour d’appel de l’Alberta


Strata Plan KAS3058 v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co. (c.o.b. Travellers)
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • February 18 2014

The Court concluded that the extension of coverage for Interruption by Civil Authority did not provide coverage for subsequent consequential losses


Johnson v. Aviva Insurance Co. of Canada
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • January 27 2015

Insurer was found to owe insured a duty to defend notwitstanding allegations of intentional conduct causing harm and an exclusion in the policy for


Insurer May Not Deny Coverage for Business Losses, Even When Another Party Is Liable To Pay
  • Miller Thomson LLP
  • Canada
  • November 25 2016

In the recent decision in 2224981 Ontario Inc. v. Intact Insurance Company, 2016 ONCA 870, the Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal from an


Delay in coverage decision attracts criticism from Ontario Court of Appeal
  • Miller Thomson LLP
  • Canada
  • February 12 2015

On February 6, 2005, three motorcycle drivers were racing. One of the drivers, Mr. Werkman, lost control and struck a car seriously injuring the