We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 160

Presentation by Eithne McCarthy - the new Insurance Block Exemption Regulation
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • April 22 2010

Eithne McCarthy, from the Financial Services Unit of the European Commission's Competition Directorate General (DG Comp), made a presentation on the new Insurance Block Exemption Regulation (BER) to the Law Society's Competition Section on 13 April 2010


New York State Court denies motion to compel discovery of reinsurance and reserve information
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • July 29 2010

In Mt. McKinley Ins. Co. v. Corning Inc., 2010 NY Slip Op 20235 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. June 14, 2010), an insured (“Corning”) moved to compel discovery of reinsurance and reserve information from its insurers, arguing that this information was relevant, material and necessary to its coverage claim


California insurers divest $400 million in Iran-related assets
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • July 28 2010

California Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner announced on July 1, 2010 that insurers in his state had sold about 20 of the assets the industry holds in the 50 companies that the California Department of Insurance ("CDI") has identified as doing business with Iran's nuclear, energy and defense sectors


New York Insurance Exchange working groups formed
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • January 27 2010

According to media reports, following meetings with insurance executives from over 50 companies, the New York Insurance Department has selected Special Counsel Maria Filipakis to supervise the reopening of the New York Insurance Exchange (the “Exchange”


Connecticut trial court holds that “general business practice” element of an unfair settlement practice claim requires multiple acts of misconduct against multiple insureds
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • February 5 2010

A Connecticut trial court recently held that the “general business practice” element of an unfair settlement practice claim under the Connecticut Unfair Insurance Practices Act, Conn. Gen. Stat. 38a-816(6) (“CUIPA”) requires that a plaintiff prove multiple unfair practices by an insurer against more than one insured


Connecticut Supreme Court affirms summary judgment for insurer on because prior administrative proceeding for unemployment benefits constituted a related claim
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • June 15 2010

The Connecticut Supreme Court recently affirmed summary judgment in favor of an insurance company on the basis that a wrongful termination lawsuit against an insured was related to a prior administrative action for unemployment benefits and was therefore excluded by the policy


Second Circuit: distinguishing between policy definitions subject to NY Insurance Law 3420(d)(2)’s timely disclaimer requirement as an exclusion and those that are not
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • June 16 2010

In a decision issued on February 1, 2010, the United Stated Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit confirmed that under New York law some policy provisions, although placed outside of the policy's "Exclusions" section, may nonetheless be considered an exclusion and, therefore, subject to the timely disclaimer and denial requirement of NY Insurance Law 3420(d)(2


Federal Court Orders Party to Produce Copies of its Reinsurance Agreements Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • July 27 2010

Plaintiff moved to compel production of defendant American Red Cross' reinsurance agreements


Ninth Circuit holds that infringement of patented website feature constitutes "advertising injury"
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • April 14 2010

The Ninth Circuit recently ruled that a general liability insurer must defend its insured against a patent infringement lawsuit relating to a feature on the insured's website


Minnesota to lower surplus lines stamping fee
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • July 1 2010

The Minnesota Department of Commerce will lower the surplus lines stamping fee from 0.0025 to 0.0008, effective January 1, 2011