We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 32

Stern v. Marshall: how big is it?
  • Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
  • USA
  • July 14 2011

On June 23, 2011, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts, that a Bankruptcy Judge lacked constitutional authority to issue a final ruling on state law counterclaims by a debtor against a claimant


City of Stockton: Bankruptcy Court holds that Rule 9019 does not apply to Chapter 9 debtors
  • Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
  • USA
  • January 31 2013

On January 30, 2013, Judge Christopher Klein of the Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California held that, pursuant to section 904 of the


Supreme Court holds that orders denying plan confirmation are not final for appellate purposes
  • Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
  • USA
  • May 21 2015

On May 4, 2015, a unanimous United States Supreme Court in Bullard v. Blue Hills, 135 S. Ct. 1686 (2015), resolved a long-standing circuit court split


TCEH bankruptcy: SDNY Transfers Delaware Trust Company v. Wilmington Trust N.A. Intercreditor dispute to Delaware Bankruptcy Court, reaffirming broad view of bankruptcy jurisdiction
  • Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
  • USA
  • August 5 2015

On July 23, 2015, in an action arising from the huge TCEH chapter 11 bankruptcy, Judge Paul A. Engelmayer of the U.S. District Court for the Southern


Court approves extension of the automatic stay in Detroit’s chapter 9
  • Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
  • USA
  • July 26 2013

On July 24, 2013, Judge Steven W. Rhodes of the Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Michigan approved the City of Detroit's motion to extend


City of Detroit files Chapter 9 bankruptcy petition challenges ahead
  • Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
  • USA
  • July 19 2013

On the afternoon of July 18, 2013, the City of Detroit filed its highly anticipated petition for relief under Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code in the


Court holds that Stockton is eligible to file for chapter 9
  • Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
  • USA
  • April 3 2013

On April 1, 2013, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California ruled that the City of Stockton qualified to file for protection


Court holds that San Bernardino is eligible to file for Chapter 9
  • Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
  • USA
  • October 24 2013

On October 16, 2013, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California ruled that the City of San Bernardino is eligible for


Lehman Bankruptcy Court issues safe harbor decision
  • Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
  • USA
  • January 6 2014

On December 19, 2013, Judge James M. Peck of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York issued his latest decision in


Delaware’s not so safe harbors: Third Circuit Bankruptcy Court declines to rule that a payment on a letter of credit is an avoidance-proof “settlement payment”
  • Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
  • USA
  • April 17 2012

On March 26, 2012, Judge Mary F. Walrath of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware refused to rule that, as a matter of law, payments made to satisfy a debtor’s obligations under a letter of credit constitute “settlement payments” protected from avoidance under section 546(e) of the Bankruptcy Code