We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 2,529

Getting control of hot-button labor and employment issues in the digital age
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • November 2 2015

Employers in the technology, media and telecommunications industry are faced with many workplace management and legal compliance challenges. Among

ICO Warning on Marketing Calls
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • United Kingdom
  • December 7 2015

In a blog post, the ICO has provided some suggestions to companies making marketing calls to consumers, to help them avoid falling foul of data

Phone Hacking: Privacy Damages Re-defined
  • Collyer Bristow LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • April 1 2016

On 17 December 2015, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in a group of cases known as Gulati & Ors v MGN Limited. The claims alleged serious

ICO monetary penalties
  • DAC Beachcroft
  • United Kingdom
  • October 19 2015

The ICO has issued a fine to Cold Call in the amount of £75,000. This rather ironic monetary penalty determination against Cold Call (a

Still sending Faxes? Consider content before hitting “send”!
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • USA
  • December 30 2016

Last week, the Federal Communications Commission (the Commission) released an Order denying a Petition for Declaratory Ruling by Kohll’s Pharmacy &

At a glance: CASL
  • Bryan Cave LLP
  • Canada
  • September 23 2015

On July 1, 2014, the central provisions of the Canadian Anti-Spam Law (CASL) came into force. These provisions generally prohibit the sending of a

Status updates - September 4th, 2014
  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • USA
  • September 4 2014

Blind spots. Self-driving cars are an excellent example of innovation, and the ones with Google technology have already traveled more than 700,000

IP & technology review 8 December 2014
  • Roschier
  • Finland, Sweden
  • December 8 2014

The Market Court has on 19 November 2014 ruled on a trademark case (MAO:80914) concerning alleged slavish imitation and unfair exploitation of

“Th-th-th-that’s all, folks!” federal judge dismisses class action against Cartoon Network, finds anonymous user IDs don’t qualify as personal information under VPPA
  • Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
  • USA
  • October 29 2014

On October 8, Georgia Federal District Judge Thomas Thrash, Jr., dismissed a putative class action against The Cartoon Network, Inc., where the

Mobile App Providers Encouraged to Obtain User Consent Before Sharing Video Viewing Information with Any Third Party After Gannett Mega-damages VPPA Claim Moves Forward
  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • USA
  • May 4 2016

If you offer a mobile application that allows consumers to watch videos of any kind, and if you share that video-viewing information with an