We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 9,152

Target data breach settlement
  • Kane Russell Coleman & Logan PC
  • USA
  • May 21 2015

On November 30, 2013, I stopped at Target to purchase a birthday gift for my friends’ one-year-old daughter. Little did I know that I would be


Court finds online data collection legal under California’s Song-Beverly Act
  • Arent Fox LLP
  • USA
  • May 21 2015

A California appeals court recently held in Ambers v. Beverages & More, Inc. that retailers are permitted under state law to request customers’


Future unclear for NSA’s bulk telephone metadata collection program
  • McGuireWoods LLP
  • USA
  • May 21 2015

Fast approaching is the June 1 expiration of certain provisions of the Patriot Act, including 215 (codified as50 U.S.C 1861), which is


Connecticut Supreme Court issues decision on commercial general liability coverage for data breaches
  • Day Pitney LLP
  • USA
  • May 20 2015

The National Association of Insurance Commissioners has warned that commercial insurance policies providing general liability coverage do not apply


Cyber insurance: why you should require certain vendors to have it
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • May 20 2015

One way to protect your business from financial loss, reputational damage, and the expense of regulatory scrutiny in the event of a data breach is to


Second Circuit rules PATRIOT Act does not authorize government's bulk telephone metadata collection program
  • Pepper Hamilton LLP
  • USA
  • May 19 2015

The ruling is a significant development in the executive, legislative and judicial struggle to strike the right balance between protecting privacy


Connecticut Supreme Court affirms no coverage for lost tapes absent publication of data
  • Wilson Elser
  • USA
  • May 19 2015

In Recall Total Information Mgmt., Inc. v. Federal Ins. Co., SC19201 (Conn. May 18, 2015), the Connecticut Supreme Court held that where there was no


The perils of redaction: simple steps to protect confidential information
  • Barnes & Thornburg LLP
  • USA
  • May 19 2015

The exchange of confidential information is an inevitable feature of modern litigation. The volume of confidential information has blossomed to the


Whose privilege is it anyway? In Illinois, privilege belongs to accountant rather than client
  • Barnes & Thornburg LLP
  • USA
  • May 19 2015

Many clients believe they absolutely control the disclosure or confidentiality of information they provide to their accountants. That may not be true


Big win for the little guys!
  • Graydon Head & Ritchey LLP
  • USA
  • May 19 2015

A Pennsylvania trial court recently held that for purposes of the federal Communications Decency Act, it is not the size of the blogger in the fight