We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 116

Processing of "health data" by lifestyle and wellbeing apps: clarification by the Article 29 Working Party
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union
  • April 6 2015

Following a request by the European Commission, the Article 29 Working Party has published a letter with the purpose of clarifying the scope of the


Will the Court of Justice of the European Union invalidate "safe harbor" agreements because of the Prism scandal?
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union
  • November 7 2014

After Directive 200624EC on Data Retention, which the ECJ ruled to be invalid on April 8, 2014, will the Court invalidate "Safe Harbor" agreements


MedTech Europe recommends phasing out conference sponsorship for HCPs by 2018
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union
  • February 6 2015

The trade associations for the Med-Tech and Diagnostics industries in Europe have recommended phasing out by 1 January 2018 all direct sponsorship of


Recent developments for the third quarter 2012
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • Australia, China, European Union, France, Israel, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Singapore, Taiwan, United Kingdom, USA
  • January 8 2013

This letter is from the Global Equity Services ("GES") group in San Francisco, Chicago and New York. Attorneys in the GES practice group work


European Court of Justice declares Data Retention Directive invalid
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union
  • April 24 2014

In a landmark judgment, the Court of Justice of the European Union ("EU") has declared the EU Data Retention Directive to be invalid


Hungary - Hungarian data protection: modernization of the law and of practice
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union, Hungary
  • June 19 2013

The Hungarian Data Protection Act currently prohibits sub-processing. On 1 July 2013, this will change and data processors will be allowed to engage


Google responds to right to be forgotten decision
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union
  • July 25 2014

On 13 May 2014, the CJEU issued its decision in the case of Google Inc and Google Spain against the Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Datos (the


Reforms to EU data protection rules: addressing data privacy across the EU
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union
  • May 27 2014

In the wake of revelations about US surveillance of, in particular, EU public officials, there has been a marked shift in public perception on data


The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) blurs the distinction between breach of privacy and defamation
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union
  • May 27 2014

Three recent decisions of the ECtHR have been criticised for shifting the focus in defamation cases away from an assessment of the truthfulness of


Privacy Impact Assessments the sooner, the better!
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union, Spain
  • February 9 2015

The European Commission is currently revisiting the EU Data Protection Framework in order to provide more safeguards for online privacy rights. One