We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 59

Riteaid pays $1 million fine to settle FTC and HHS data disposal charges
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • September 30 2010

Rite Aid has agreed to pay $1 million in fines to resolve allegations that it violated the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act by disposing of pharmaceutical bottles and prescription information into publicly accessible dumpsters near Rite Aid stores


Bankruptcy court approves destruction of personal information gathered on gay teen site
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • September 30 2010

The judge presiding over the bankruptcy proceeding of the operator of a Web site and magazine aimed at gay teens has approved a settlement allowing the destruction of personal information of users rather than a sale to creditors as part of the bankruptcy estate


Virginia privacy law unconstitutional as applied to advocate's online posting of SSNs
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • September 30 2010

A Virginia statute prohibiting the public disclosure of Social Security Numbers is unconstitutional as applied to a privacy advocate who posted publicly available land records containing unredacted Social Security Numbers as part of a privacy lobbying effort, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled


Employee violation of employer computer use policy can support CFAA criminal charge
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • May 5 2011

An employee's violation of an employer's computer use policy can support a criminal charge of exceeding authorized access under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, a district court ruled


FTC finalizes settlement with Twitter for failure to safeguard consumer personal information
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • May 5 2011

The charges arose out of lapses in the security of the social networking site's administrative accounts, which enabled hackers to gain access to both administrative and customer accounts


No Fourth Amendment violation in transfer of laptop seized at border for forensic examination
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • May 5 2011

The transfer of a laptop seized at a border crossing to a facility 170 miles away for forensic examination was justified under the border search doctrine, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled


Cost of credit monitoring for victims of data security breach constitutes loss under CFAA
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • May 5 2011

The cost of providing credit monitoring for employees whose personal information was accessed as a result of unauthorized access by an inmate to a prison computer network constitutes a "loss" under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit ruled


Decreased value of consumer personal information resulting from security breach confers standing in personal injury suit
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • May 5 2011

A plaintiff whose personal data was contained in a social network service online database copied by a hacker sufficiently alleged an injury-in-fact to support Article III standing, on the theory that the value of his personal information was diminished as a result of the breach, a district court ruled


Employee access to computer network in furtherance of criminal fraud “exceeds authorized access” under CFAA
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • April 14 2010

An employee who accessed financial data on her employer's computer network in violation of official policy in order to perpetrate a criminal scheme exceeded her authorized access to the network within the meaning of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled


No reasonable expectation of privacy in contents of shared folder accessible via unsecured wireless router
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • April 14 2010

A defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the contents of a shared folder that was accessible via an unsecured wireless router to which his computer was connected, a district court ruled