We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 84

Otsuka successful in stay application: Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd v Generic Health Pty Ltd 2015 FCA 848
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia
  • August 26 2015

Further to our post of 7 July 2015, the proceedings brought by Otsuka and Bristol Myers Squibb (the "exclusive licensee" of Otsuka's patents for


Australian case notes - Odisho v Bonazzi 2014 VSCA 11
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia
  • May 20 2014

In this case the appellant, a patient who suffered a thromboembolic event following the use of tranexamic acid, claimed that her doctor had


Competition regulators continue their campaign against pharmaceutical companies
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia, USA
  • June 1 2011

Last month, the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) released its findings on reverse payment settlements between pharmaceutical companies in the 2010 US fiscal year


Generic Health succeeds in invalidating patent for aripiprazole: Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd v Generic Health Pty Ltd (No 4) 2015 FCA 634
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia
  • July 7 2015

Generic Health is perhaps a step closer to bringing its generic version of the antipsychotic drug aripiprazole to market in Australia after Justice


Food law: quick bites and upcoming calendar
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia
  • April 30 2015

The ACCC is seeking leave to appeal the Federal Court decision dismissing its case against Pfizer for alleged misuse of market power and exclusive


De-identification and medical records in NSW
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia
  • October 24 2014

Are health service providers in New South Wales obliged by the Health Records and Information Privacy Act 2002 (NSW) to de-identify medical records


FWC supports employer’s right to nominate doctor
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia
  • July 8 2014

The Fair Work Commission has ruled that an employer was entitled to require one of its employees to attend an appointment with a general practitioner


High Court states the obvious: AstraZeneca AB v Apotex Pty Ltd appeal decided
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia
  • September 3 2015

In a widely anticipated decision, the High Court has upheld a decision of the Full Federal Court (which was made by five, rather than the usual three


Those drugs cost how much?? Chemist warehouse price list misleading but not for the reasons you might think
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia
  • October 29 2012

Last Monday the Supreme Court of Queensland held that a price list published by various Chemist Warehouse pharmacies in Cairns, Nerang, Coolangatta and other parts of Queensland was likely to mislead or deceive and therefore contravene clause 18 of the Australian Consumer Law (Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), schedule 2, section 18


European Commission ups the cost of paying for delay
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia, European Union, USA
  • August 13 2012

On 25 July 2012, the EC alleged that Danish pharmaceutical company Lundbeck violated EU antitrust rules by colluding to prevent other pharma companies from marketing generic versions of its best-seller antidepressant, citalopram