We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 75

U.S. Supreme Court refines & limits antitrust state action defense
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • February 26 2015

On February 25, 2015, the United States Supreme Court issued a 6-3 opinion in North Carolina State Bd of Dental Examiners v. FTC, which held that a


Supreme Court decision to drop on Thursday
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • June 25 2012

This morning the Supreme Court issued its ruling on the constitutionally of Arizona’s new immigration law


TTAB rules that fraud in less than all classes does not warrant cancellation of multi-class registration in toto
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • February 11 2009

On January 29, 2009, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office answered a significant open question in the post-Medinol era, namely, whether a finding of fraud with regard to fewer than all International Classes in a multi-Class trademark registration requires cancellation of the entire registration or whether cancellation will be limited to all goodsservices in the Class in which fraud is found


In re Kubin another hurdle for DNA sequence patents
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • April 7 2009

A typical scenario in the development of biotech patents claiming DNA sequences: a bench researcher discovers the isolation and characterization of a protein that may have desirable biological activity and publishes a paper describing the results


FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc., et al.
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • February 20 2013

On February 19, 2013, the United States Supreme Court in Federal Trade Commission v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc., et al., unanimously rejected


Dueling court cases issued on same day
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • July 24 2014

On Tuesday morning the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that an IRS rule for a key piece of the 2010 Affordable Care


11th Circuit upholds Broward County
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • August 21 2012

Yesterday, the US Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit upheld summary judgment in favor of the employer in Seff v. Broward County


Medical syringe company finds competitors’ mark a sticking point; pricks its ire
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • August 21 2012

In DuoProSS Meditech Corp. v. Inviro Medical Devices, Ltd., No 2012-1050, 2012 WL 3292920 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 14, 2012), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board erred in failing to cancel two trademark registrations for medical syringes designed to be broken so they could not be reused


Participants sue wellness program
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • February 14 2011

Last week a federal district court in Florida certified a class action against Broward County Florida's health plan


Nondiscrimination rules delayed for insured health plans
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • January 1 2011

The Affordable Care Act imposes, for the first time, nondiscrimination rules on non-grandfathered, insured group health plans similar to those that apply to self-insured plans under Section 105(h) of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code