We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 93

U.S. Supreme Court refines & limits antitrust state action defense
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • February 26 2015

On February 25, 2015, the United States Supreme Court issued a 6-3 opinion in North Carolina State Bd of Dental Examiners v. FTC, which held that a


Disability claims procedures get an Affordable Care Act makeover
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • November 18 2015

In light of the volume of litigation involving claims for disability benefits, and the perceived need to improve procedural protections for workers


Anti-assignment provisions and providers
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • August 6 2015

Beginning last year, there has been a rash of court decisions giving ERISA participant andor beneficiary status to providers based on assignments


Supreme Court decision to drop on Thursday
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • June 25 2012

This morning the Supreme Court issued its ruling on the constitutionally of Arizona’s new immigration law


Dueling court cases issued on same day
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • July 24 2014

On Tuesday morning the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that an IRS rule for a key piece of the 2010 Affordable Care


FTC v. Actavis
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • June 21 2013

On June 17, 2013, the Supreme Court issued an opinion authored by Justice Breyer in FTC v. Actavis, holding that "reverse payment" settlements are


FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc., et al.
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • February 20 2013

On February 19, 2013, the United States Supreme Court in Federal Trade Commission v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc., et al., unanimously rejected


Preventive care court decision
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • November 19 2012

A federal judge in the District of Columbia circuit issued a stay from the contraceptive coverage mandate


NLRB sets a heightened standard for employers challenging narrow bargaining units
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • September 21 2011

When a union petitions the National Labor Relations Board to be certified as the bargaining representative for a group of employees, it identifies the group or "bargaining unit" that it seeks to represent


TTAB rules that fraud in less than all classes does not warrant cancellation of multi-class registration in toto
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • February 11 2009

On January 29, 2009, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office answered a significant open question in the post-Medinol era, namely, whether a finding of fraud with regard to fewer than all International Classes in a multi-Class trademark registration requires cancellation of the entire registration or whether cancellation will be limited to all goodsservices in the Class in which fraud is found