We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,428

In Which Ontario Court Do I Bring My Constitutional Challenge?
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • Canada
  • April 26 2017

“Can a litigant challenge the constitutional validity of subordinate legislation such as a provincial regulation by bringing an application under Rule


Supreme Court of Canada Bulletin - April 20, 2017
  • Gowling WLG
  • Canada
  • April 20 2017

On May 12, 1969, the applicant Churchill Falls (Labrador) Corporation Limited and the respondent HydroQuébec entered into a contract pursuant to


BC will see big changes to small claims on June 1, 2017
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • Canada
  • April 19 2017

On March 20, 2017, the Province of British Columbia announced significant changes to the jurisdiction of the Civil Resolution Tribunal (CRT) and


Supreme Court of Canada Bulletin - 13042017
  • Gowling WLG
  • Canada
  • April 13 2017

Mr. Wall was a member of the Highwood Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses, an unincorporated religious association. He was disfellowshipped by a


Can a conventional action be “converted” into a class action in BC?
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • Canada
  • April 13 2017

The answer is yes. On April 6, 2017, in a novel case, the British Columbia Supreme Court held that a conventional or individual action can be


Lenovo and Superfish: Proposed Class Action Proceeds on Privacy Tort and Statutes
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • Canada
  • April 12 2017

A recent privacy decision regarding pre-installed software on laptops may have implications for companies operating not only in the traditional


Co-Plaintiff Spouse Could be Excluded from Examination for Discovery
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • April 11 2017

The Ontario Divisional Court recently provided guidance with respect to excluding co-parties from each other's examination for discovery. In Lazar v


‘DIY': Experts Must Write Their Own Reports
  • Blaney McMurtry LLP
  • Canada
  • April 11 2017

Recently, I received a report from an engineering expert, which was poorly written: bad grammar and organization, unnecessarily long, and missing


Supreme Court of Canada Bulletin - 06 April, 2017
  • Gowling WLG
  • Canada
  • April 6 2017

On appeal from a judgment of the Quebec Court of Appeal (2015 QCCA 1368) affirming a decision of Dumas J. (2013 QCCS 5808). Between 1994 and 2011, A


Supreme Court Defers to Professional Regulatory Bodies’ Rules
  • MLT Aikins LLP
  • Canada
  • April 6 2017

In its recent judgment rendered in Green v Law Society of Manitoba1 ("Green"), the Supreme Court of Canada continued the deferential approach it