We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,740

New IRS guidance on tax treatment of attorney’s fees
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • September 13 2013

The IRS recently released a memorandum advising taxpayers on the proper tax characterization of attorney's fee payments in connection with a


Does privilege apply to advice from non-legal professions?
  • Mayer Brown LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • April 22 2013

In a recent English Judgment concerning R (Prudential Plc and another) v. Special Commissioner of Income Tax and another 2013 UKSC 1, the Supreme


IRS says same-sex marriages are marriages for tax purposes no matter the state of residence
  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • USA
  • September 6 2013

Recently, the IRS and Treasury Department announced that same-sex couples would be treated as married for all federal income tax purposes if the


Supreme Court holds valuation misstatement penalty applies to partners of a partnership disregarded due to lack of economic substance
  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • USA
  • December 3 2013

The Supreme Court held today, in United States v. Woods, that the valuation-misstatement penalty can apply to partners in a case in which a


Federal tax law changes and opportunities for same-sex married couples
  • Choate Hall & Stewart LLP
  • USA
  • November 21 2013

As the result of the Supreme Court's recent decision in United States v. Windsor and a subsequent ruling by the IRS, same-sex couples who are


Implications of the Supreme Court’s Windsor decision on estate planning for same-sex couples
  • Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
  • USA
  • July 29 2013

On June 26, 2013, the Supreme Court, in its decision in United States v. Windsor, overturned Section 3 of the Federal Defense of Marriage Act


UKSC declines to extend privilege to legal advice given by non-lawyers
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • March 19 2013

Not a surprising result, but a significant decision. PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) devised a tax avoidance scheme, which the Prudential group of


Be prudent with privilege: Legal advice from non-lawyers is not privileged under English and Bermuda Law
  • Sedgwick LLP
  • Bermuda, United Kingdom
  • January 23 2013

In its first major judgment of 2013, R (on the application of Prudential plc and another) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax and another 2013


Federal tax guidance for same-sex couples and employee benefit plans
  • Dykema Gossett PLLC
  • USA
  • September 6 2013

On August 29, 2013, the IRS and Department of Treasury issued the much anticipated, federal tax guidance adopting a rule that the marital status of a


IRS Guidance requires recognition of same-sex marriage for employee benefits
  • Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered
  • USA
  • September 4 2013

On August 29, 2013, the IRS issued Revenue Ruling 2013-17 which offers important guidance to employers on the application, for federal tax purposes