We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,816

Implications of the Supreme Court’s Windsor decision on estate planning for same-sex couples
  • Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
  • USA
  • July 29 2013

On June 26, 2013, the Supreme Court, in its decision in United States v. Windsor, overturned Section 3 of the Federal Defense of Marriage Act

Estate planning opportunities in a world without DOMA
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • July 3 2013

On June 26, 2013, the United States Supreme Court issued its decisions in Windsor v. United States and Hollingsworth, et. al. v. Perry et. al., thus

Spendthrift trust was an attempt to delay payment to creditors under Oklahoma Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act
  • Bryan Cave LLP
  • USA
  • June 27 2013

What is the extent of the settlor's intent required to find that a transfer to an irrevocable asset protection trust is a transfer in fraud of

SCOTUS holds DOMA unconstitutional
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • July 19 2013

On June 26, 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States ("SCOTUS") held that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act ("DOMA") was unconstitutional

Supreme Court strikes down Defense of Marriage Act: what are the changes for employers?
  • Bracewell LLP
  • USA
  • October 2 2013

On June 26, 2013, the United States Supreme Court held that Section 3 the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which prevented the federal government

Getting divorced - what the non-dom changes mean for you
  • Kingsley Napley
  • United Kingdom
  • March 4 2016

In the 2015 Budget, George Osborne announced that, from 6 April 2017, certain new categories of non-UK-domiciled individuals will be deemed to be

Second Circuit upholds common-interest privilege for borrower’s sharing of legal advice with consortium of lenders
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • November 18 2015

The Second Circuit held last week that a borrower did not waive the attorney-client privilege by providing documents to a consortium of lender banks

Applications for leave to appeal granted - 10 December 2015
  • Gowling WLG
  • Canada
  • December 10 2015

Mr. Green is lawyer, called to the Bar of Manitoba in 1955, who did not comply with the requirement prescribed by the Law Society of Manitoba (“LSM”

District Court Upholds Summons and Rejects Attorney-Client and Work Product Privilege
  • Shearman & Sterling LLP
  • USA
  • February 10 2016

On November 16, 2015, the United States District Court, Southern District of Mississippi, dismissed a petition to quash a third-party summons served

A Case Study: Knowing the limits of your legal professional privilege
  • Brown Wright Stein Lawyers
  • Australia
  • December 22 2015

The Full Federal Court recently upheld an appeal against the Federal Court decision by Justice Logan in Donoghue v Commissioner of Taxation 2015