We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 12,617

Subject access requests: Court of Appeal confirms that a requester's motive does not justify a refusal to comply
  • Bond Dickinson LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • February 24 2017

The case of Dawson-Damer and Others v Taylor Wessing LLP 2017 EWCA Civ 74 addresses the questions of whether an organisation can refuse to comply


Trans-Tasman IP Attorneys
  • Wrays
  • Australia, New Zealand
  • February 24 2017

Under the 2009 Single Economic Market (SEM) agenda, the New Zealand and Australian Governments agreed a joint work programme to remove regulatory


Scope of third party disclosure clarified
  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • United Kingdom
  • February 24 2017

In a recent application, a party sought an order for disclosure of certain documents from a third party. The Court has discretion to order third


Mayers v. Khan Summary Judgment can be appropriate to determine liability even when key facts are in dispute
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • February 23 2017

In Mayers v. Khan, 2017 ONSC 200, the Superior Court of Justice concluded that a motion for summary judgment can be appropriate in motor vehicle


High Court rejects an appeal made on the basis that the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal is not independent of the SRA and Law Society
  • Kingsley Napley
  • United Kingdom
  • February 23 2017

Mr Ashok Sancheti, a solicitor (‘the Appellant’), appealed the decision of the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (‘the Tribunal’), following a finding


A Tale of Attorneys’ Fees
  • Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP
  • USA
  • February 23 2017

The backdrop is simple: Mistras Group operates a business that evaluates the structural integrity of energy, industrial and public infrastructure


Former GC wins $8 million; SOX pre-empted state ethics rule on client confidentiality
  • Thompson Hine LLP
  • USA
  • February 22 2017

A whistle-blowing General Counsel won an $8 million federal jury verdict earlier this month, in a case that might encourage other GC’s to call out


Litigants-in-person: Make it Stop!
  • Spratt Endicott Solicitors
  • United Kingdom
  • February 22 2017

Over the last few years, we have seen the rise of the Litigant-in-person (“LIP”). To lawyers, this is only even more concerning than the rise of the


Subject Access Requests: obligation to comply confirmed by Court of Appeal
  • Burges Salmon LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • February 22 2017

An individual whose data is being processed (a data subject) has the right to request copies of that data from the organisation that is processing it


Does the Shelton Standard Apply to In-House Lawyers?
  • McGuireWoods LLP
  • USA
  • February 22 2017

Nearly every court protects a litigant's lawyer from depositions or other discovery under what is called the Shelton standard ( Shelton v. American