We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 10,021

LiP service? Dealing with litigants in person
  • Penningtons Manches LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • August 27 2015

Swingeing cuts to legal aid; vastly increased court fees; a higher small claims limit, the "unbundling" of legal services... No wonder most courts


Billing follies what not to do
  • Thompson Hine LLP
  • USA
  • August 27 2015

This week's not-to-be-missed article on lawyer folly is a jaw dropping round-up of bad billing conduct, as reported in the American Lawyer. It's


The privilege can protect employee-to-employee communications
  • McGuireWoods LLP
  • USA
  • August 26 2015

Because attorney-client privilege protection depends primarily on communications' content, privilege logs rarely play a dispositive role in courts'


C.C.’ing Sabathia
  • Dentons
  • USA
  • August 26 2015

For a while now, I have been wanting to write a Risk Tip about the perils of cc'ing too many, or the wrong, people in emails. But I never quite had


The advocate’s immunity how broad is its scope?
  • The Commercial Bar Association of Victoria
  • Australia
  • August 26 2015

The Full Court of the Federal Court held unanimously that the advocate’s immunity does not apply to an interlocutory decision to strike out a cause of


DC Circuit: internal investigation documents are protected from disclosure in FCA case
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • August 26 2015

Reversing a lower court decision, the D.C. Circuit recently concluded - for a second time - that certain internal audit documents are protected from


The Netflix of legal research
  • Wortzmans
  • Canada
  • August 26 2015

Key word searching for legal research may be a thing of the past - along with legal research companies - thanks to the artificial intelligence of a


First District holds public agency’s inadvertent disclosure of privileged documents in response to PRA request does not waive privilege; decision has implications for administrative record preparation process in CEQA and other actions
  • Miller Starr Regalia
  • USA
  • August 25 2015

On July 31, 2015, the Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District, Division One, filed a 23-page published opinion holding that the inadvertent


Scope of attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine in internal investigations clarified
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • August 25 2015

The scope of the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine for internal investigation reports has once again been clarified by the D.C


Taking a closer look at the Hong Kong Court of Appeal judgment in adopting a wider test
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • Hong Kong
  • August 24 2015

The judgment recently delivered by the Hong Kong Court of Appeal (CA) in Citic Pacific Limited v Secretary for Justice and Commissioner of Police