We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 83

Pre-nuptial agreements: wedding bells or alarm bells?
  • Carey Olsen
  • Guernsey, Jersey
  • July 10 2014

Entering into a marriage or civil partnership is one of life's greatest events but is also big business; tens of thousands of pounds are spent by


New capacity legislation in Jersey
  • 39 Essex Chambers
  • Jersey
  • October 10 2016

The Capacity and Self-Determination (Jersey) Law 2016 was passed by the States Assembly in September 2016, with Royal Assent expected in November. It


Where there's a will, there's an executor (or five)
  • Ogier
  • Jersey
  • July 24 2012

The Royal Court recently delivered a judgment concerning the principles to be applied where a body of executors is deadlocked


‘Momentous’ decisions in dividing trust assets
  • Carey Olsen
  • Guernsey, Jersey
  • September 30 2016

In a Q&A for LexisNexis, Karen Le Cras, Richard Field and Paula Fry examine the background to the matter of the LKM Discretionary Trust and its


Jersey introduces cycle helmet law
  • Neil Hudgell Solicitors
  • Jersey, United Kingdom
  • July 30 2014

New legislation has been introduced in Jersey making it compulsory for children under the age of 14 to wear a helmet when cycling, in an effort to


Offshore assets and the divorce
  • Collas Crill
  • Jersey, United Kingdom
  • October 19 2012

This is an English High Court (Family Division) case involving a Jersey proper law trust whereby Mostyn J examined the treatment of a Jersey trust in divorce proceedings and made an interesting comment about a Jersey trustee’s potential involvement in proceedings


Judgement summary: directions redisclosure to foreign courts
  • Collas Crill
  • Jersey
  • November 27 2012

In 2011 the trustee applied for directions from the Royal Court to approve two “momentous” decisions, namely (1) the disclosure of trust information to beneficiaries knowing that the beneficiary was likely to pass the information to a non-beneficiary (a spouse) and the Family Division of the English High Court (“Family Division”) in divorce proceedings; and (2) not to submit to the jurisdiction of the Family Division in a beneficiary’s divorce proceedings


Laws and orders brought into force in 2012
  • Bedell Cristin
  • Jersey
  • September 7 2012

The Banking Business (General Provisions) (Amendment No. 3) (Jersey) Order 2011 came into force on 25 January 2012. The Order amends the Banking Business (General Provisions) (Jersey) Order 2002 in relation to deposit taking


Protecting interests in divorce proceedings
  • Ogier
  • Jersey
  • May 27 2009

The trustee in this case sought the blessing of the Royal Court to certain decisions made in relation to the R Trust and the M Trust


Laws and orders brought into force in 2012
  • Bedell Cristin
  • Jersey
  • November 9 2012

The Banking Business (Depositors Compensation) (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provision) (Jersey) Regulations 2012 came into force, with the exception of Regulation 23, on 2 October 2012